Pillay M
Optimum Health Services (Lewisham Team for Adults with Learning Disabilities), London.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1998;33 Suppl:84-9. doi: 10.3109/13682829809179402.
The manner in which speech and language therapy (SLT) considers communicating evidence of practice with a multicultural clientele is considered in context of cultural imperialism. A conceptual framework (i.e., the curriculum of practice) developed from a South African study (Pillay 1997), is highlighted for use in understanding, evaluating and communicating evidence of practice with the clientele in focus. The lens (or paradigm) used by SLT to view its curriculum of practice may reveal different stories about the same subject. Given this, the critical paradigm is proffered over that of the empirical-analytical (or 'scientific') and hermeneutic-interpretive types of paradigms. Finally, suggestions regarding the development of critical SLT are discussed.
言语和语言治疗（SLT）在文化帝国主义的背景下，考虑如何与多元文化客户群体交流实践证据。文中重点介绍了一个源自南非研究（皮莱，1997年）的概念框架（即实践课程），用于理解、评估并与相关客户群体交流实践证据。言语和语言治疗用来审视其实践课程的视角（或范式），可能会就同一主题揭示出不同的情况。鉴于此，文中推崇批判性范式，而非实证分析（或“科学”）及诠释性解释类型的范式。最后，讨论了有关发展批判性言语和语言治疗的建议。
