Harder A, Wildgruber R, Nawrocki A, Fey S J, Larsen P M, Görg A
Technical University of Munich, Department of Food Technology, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Electrophoresis. 1999 Apr-May;20(4-5):826-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:4/5<826::AID-ELPS826>3.0.CO;2-A.
Three different procedures for the solubilization of yeast (S. cerevisiae) cell proteins were compared on the basis of the obtained two-dimensional (2-D) polypeptide patterns. Major emphasis was laid on minimizing handling steps, protein modification or degradation, and quantitative loss of high molecular mass proteins. The procedures employed were sonication, followed by (i) protein solubilization with "standard" lysis buffer (9 M urea, 2% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 1% dithiothreitol (DTT), 2% v/v carrier ampholytes, (ii) presolubilization of proteins with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer, consisting of 1% SDS and 100 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)-HCl, pH 7.0, followed by dilution with "standard" lysis buffer, and (iii) boiling the sample with SDS during cell lysis, followed by dilution with thiourea/urea lysis buffer (2 M thiourea/ 7 M urea, 4% w/v CHAPS, 1% w/v DTT, 2% v/v carrier ampholytes). All procedures tested were rapid and simple. However, with the first procedure (i), considerable degradation of high Mr proteins occurred. In contrast, protein degradation was minimized by boiling the sample in SDS buffer immediately after sonication (method ii). Protein disaggregation and solubilization of high Mr proteins were further improved by pre-boiling with SDS and using thiourea/urea lysis buffer instead of "standard" lysis buffer (procedure iii).
基于所获得的二维(2-D)多肽图谱,比较了三种不同的溶解酵母(酿酒酵母)细胞蛋白质的方法。主要重点在于尽量减少操作步骤、蛋白质修饰或降解以及高分子量蛋白质的定量损失。所采用的方法包括超声处理,随后:(i)用“标准”裂解缓冲液(9 M尿素、2% 3-[(3-胆酰胺丙基)二甲基铵]-1-丙烷磺酸盐(CHAPS)、1%二硫苏糖醇(DTT)、2% v/v载体两性电解质)溶解蛋白质;(ii)先用十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)缓冲液(由1% SDS和100 mM三(羟甲基)氨基甲烷(Tris)-HCl,pH 7.0组成)预溶解蛋白质,然后用“标准”裂解缓冲液稀释;(iii)在细胞裂解过程中用SDS煮沸样品,然后用硫脲/尿素裂解缓冲液(2 M硫脲/7 M尿素、4% w/v CHAPS、1% w/v DTT、2% v/v载体两性电解质)稀释。所有测试的方法都快速且简单。然而,对于第一种方法(i),高分子量蛋白质发生了相当程度的降解。相比之下,通过在超声处理后立即在SDS缓冲液中煮沸样品(方法ii),蛋白质降解降至最低。通过用SDS预煮沸并使用硫脲/尿素裂解缓冲液代替“标准”裂解缓冲液(方法iii),高分子量蛋白质的解聚和溶解得到了进一步改善。