Weil T P
Bedford Health Associates, Asheville, NC, USA.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1998 Summer;21(1):92-108.
Sporadic reports in the media focus on the inability of America's social welfare leadership to protect children at risk and to allocate judiciously scarce resources. These criticisms suggest the importance of arriving at valid conclusions in both socio-psychological and economic terms so that human service specialists can evaluate the efficacy of three key strategies used for children at risk: reunification, foster care; and adoption. Rather than continuing to modify public policy without much empirical evidence, this article calls for creating a comprehensive data base that supplies the most critical treatment variables leading to reasonable successes and to the average cost per case when comparing children reunified with a biological parent to those who are placed into out-of-home settings and to those who are adopted. This proposed analysis should include public and private expenditures for the services provided by human services-welfare, special education, judicial, correctional, mental health, medical, and other related organizations.
媒体上的零星报道聚焦于美国社会福利领导层无力保护处于危险中的儿童,以及无法明智地分配稀缺资源。这些批评表明,从社会心理和经济角度得出有效结论非常重要,以便人类服务专家能够评估用于处于危险中的儿童的三种关键策略的效果:家庭团聚、寄养和收养。本文呼吁建立一个综合数据库,提供最关键的治疗变量,这些变量能带来合理的成功结果,并在比较与亲生父母团聚的儿童、被安置在家庭外环境中的儿童以及被收养儿童时,提供每个案例的平均成本,而不是在没有太多实证证据的情况下继续修改公共政策。这项拟议的分析应包括人类服务机构(福利、特殊教育、司法、惩教、心理健康、医疗及其他相关组织)提供服务的公共和私人支出。