Suppr超能文献

基于拉什视频的抽动评定量表改良评分方法的优势

Advantages of a modified scoring method for the Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale.

作者信息

Goetz C G, Pappert E J, Louis E D, Raman R, Leurgans S

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 1999 May;14(3):502-6. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(199905)14:3<502::aid-mds1020>3.0.co;2-g.

Abstract

Previously, we published a video-based objective rating scale of tics that met reliability and validity criteria for measurement of five domains of tic disability. In the original form, the scale's metric properties did not permit internal comparison of each of the five domains of impairment and did not provide a total score for use as a primary outcome measure. In this study, we retained the original scale and videotape protocol but tested whether a modified scoring system corrected these limitations. The new scoring method rated assigned tic data to ratings of 0-4 on five disability categories: number of body areas, frequency of motor tics, frequency of phonic tics, severity of motor tics, and severity of phonic tics. The sums of these ratings yielded a total score of overall tic disability (0-20). In a series of 31 patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, we assessed Spearman correlation coefficients for the old and new scoring systems as well as the correlation of the new ratings with the objectively derived sections of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), another valid and reliable scale used in clinical practice and research. For each domain, the rank order for the scores on the original scale was well retained in the new scores. Likewise, for each domain, ranking with the new scoring system correlated well with scores on the comparable objective item from the YGTSS. The new total score accurately captured the rank order of the combined five domains from the original scale and correlated well with the total objective motor plus phonic tic score from the YGTSS and the YGTSS Tourette Syndrome Overall Impairment Rating. These data demonstrate that the modified videotape-based scoring system retains the essential information gathered in the original Rush scale. The modification provides comparisons among the five assessed domains and a total objectively based disability score that can be used as a single outcome measure for assessing tic disability.

摘要

此前,我们发表了一种基于视频的抽动秽语客观评分量表,该量表满足抽动秽语障碍五个领域测量的信度和效度标准。在原始形式中,该量表的度量属性不允许对五个损害领域中的每一个进行内部比较,也没有提供一个总分作为主要结局指标。在本研究中,我们保留了原始量表和录像协议,但测试了一种修改后的评分系统是否纠正了这些局限性。新的评分方法将抽动秽语数据分配到五个残疾类别中的0-4级评分:身体部位数量、运动性抽动频率、发声性抽动频率、运动性抽动严重程度和发声性抽动严重程度。这些评分的总和得出抽动秽语总体残疾的总分(0-20分)。在一系列31例患有抽动秽语综合征的患者中,我们评估了旧评分系统和新评分系统的斯皮尔曼相关系数,以及新评分与耶鲁综合抽动严重程度量表(YGTSS)客观得出部分的相关性,YGTSS是临床实践和研究中使用的另一种有效且可靠的量表。对于每个领域,原始量表上分数的排名顺序在新分数中得到了很好的保留。同样,对于每个领域,新评分系统的排名与YGTSS中可比客观项目的分数相关性良好。新的总分准确地反映了原始量表中五个领域综合排名顺序,并且与YGTSS的总客观运动性加发声性抽动分数以及YGTSS抽动秽语综合征总体损害评分相关性良好。这些数据表明,修改后的基于录像的评分系统保留了原始拉什量表收集的基本信息。这种修改提供了五个评估领域之间的比较以及一个基于客观的总残疾评分,该评分可作为评估抽动秽语障碍的单一结局指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验