• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在埃及进行的一项随机试验中,阿奇霉素与环丙沙星治疗无并发症伤寒热的疗效对比,该试验纳入了多重耐药患者。

Azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in a randomized trial in Egypt that included patients with multidrug resistance.

作者信息

Girgis N I, Butler T, Frenck R W, Sultan Y, Brown F M, Tribble D, Khakhria R

机构信息

U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1441-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1441.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.43.6.1441
PMID:10348767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC89293/
Abstract

To compare clinical and bacteriological efficacies of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin for typhoid fever, 123 adults with fever and signs of uncomplicated typhoid fever were entered into a randomized trial. Cultures of blood were positive for Salmonella typhi in 59 patients and for S. paratyphi A in 3 cases; stool cultures were positive for S. typhi in 11 cases and for S. paratyphi A in 1 case. Multiple-drug resistance (MDR; resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) was present in isolates of 21 of 64 patients with positive cultures. Of these 64 patients, 36 received 1 g of azithromycin orally once on the first day, followed by 500 mg given orally once daily on the next 6 days; 28 patients received 500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally twice daily for 7 days. Blood cultures were repeated on days 4 and 10 after the start of therapy, and stool cultures were done on days 4, 10, and 28 after the start of therapy. All patients in both groups improved during therapy and were cured. Defervescence (maximum daily temperatures of </=38 degrees C) occurred at the following times [mean +/- standard deviation (range)] after the start of therapy: 3.8 +/- 1.1 (2 to 7) days with azithromycin and 3.3 +/- 1.0 (1 to 5) days with ciprofloxacin. No relapses were detected. Cultures of blood and stool during and after therapy were negative in all cases, except for one patient treated with azithromycin who had a positive blood culture on day 4. These results indicated that azithromycin and ciprofloxacin were similarly effective, both clinically and bacteriologically, against typhoid fever caused by both sensitive organisms and MDR S. typhi.

摘要

为比较阿奇霉素和环丙沙星治疗伤寒的临床及细菌学疗效,123例有发热及非复杂性伤寒体征的成人患者进入一项随机试验。59例患者血培养伤寒沙门菌阳性,3例副伤寒甲沙门菌阳性;11例患者粪便培养伤寒沙门菌阳性,1例副伤寒甲沙门菌阳性。64例培养阳性患者中,21例分离株存在多重耐药(对氨苄西林、氯霉素和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑耐药)。这64例患者中,36例在第1天口服1g阿奇霉素1次,随后在接下来6天每天口服500mg;28例患者口服环丙沙星500mg,每日2次,共7天。治疗开始后第4天和第10天重复血培养,治疗开始后第4天、第10天和第28天进行粪便培养。两组所有患者在治疗期间均有改善并治愈。治疗开始后,退热(最高日体温≤38℃)出现时间如下[均数±标准差(范围)]:阿奇霉素组为3.8±1.1(2至7)天,环丙沙星组为3.3±1.0(1至5)天。未检测到复发。除1例接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者在第4天血培养阳性外,治疗期间及治疗后的血培养和粪便培养在所有病例中均为阴性。这些结果表明,阿奇霉素和环丙沙星在临床和细菌学方面对敏感菌及多重耐药伤寒沙门菌引起的伤寒同样有效。

相似文献

1
Azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in a randomized trial in Egypt that included patients with multidrug resistance.在埃及进行的一项随机试验中,阿奇霉素与环丙沙星治疗无并发症伤寒热的疗效对比,该试验纳入了多重耐药患者。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1441-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1441.
2
Treatment of typhoid fever with azithromycin versus chloramphenicol in a randomized multicentre trial in India.在印度进行的一项随机多中心试验中,阿奇霉素与氯霉素治疗伤寒热的对比研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Aug;44(2):243-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.2.243.
3
Open Label Randomized Controlled Comparison of Three Alternative Regimes of Ciprofloxacin, Azithromycin and Cefixime for Treatment of Uncomplicated Typhoid Fever in Bangladesh.孟加拉国三种替代环丙沙星、阿奇霉素和头孢克肟方案治疗单纯性伤寒的开放性标签随机对照比较。
Mymensingh Med J. 2021 Jul;30(3):725-737.
4
Randomized controlled comparison of ofloxacin, azithromycin, and an ofloxacin-azithromycin combination for treatment of multidrug-resistant and nalidixic acid-resistant typhoid fever.氧氟沙星、阿奇霉素及氧氟沙星-阿奇霉素联合用药治疗多重耐药和耐萘啶酸伤寒热的随机对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):819-25. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00447-06. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
5
A randomized controlled comparison of azithromycin and ofloxacin for treatment of multidrug-resistant or nalidixic acid-resistant enteric fever.阿奇霉素与氧氟沙星治疗多重耐药或耐萘啶酸肠热症的随机对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jul;44(7):1855-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1855-1859.2000.
6
Efficacy of ciprofloxacin in enteric fever: comparison of treatment duration in sensitive and multidrug-resistant Salmonella.环丙沙星治疗肠热症的疗效:敏感和耐多药沙门氏菌治疗疗程的比较。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Sep;53(3):306-11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.306.
7
Frequency and Antibiotics Sensitivity Pattern of Culture-Positive Salmonella Typhi in Children.儿童伤寒沙门氏菌培养阳性的频率及抗生素敏感性模式
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Mar;33(3):303-307. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.03.303.
8
Treatment responses to Azithromycin and Ciprofloxacin in uncomplicated Salmonella Typhi infection: A comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Data from a Controlled Human Infection Model.治疗对阿奇霉素和环丙沙星在非复杂性伤寒沙门氏菌感染的应答:来自人体感染模型的临床和微生物学数据的比较。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Dec 26;13(12):e0007955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007955. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
A multi-center randomised controlled trial of gatifloxacin versus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam.一项在越南儿童和成人中进行的加替沙星与阿奇霉素治疗非复杂性伤寒热的多中心随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2008 May 21;3(5):e2188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002188.
10
Trends in antimicrobial resistance amongst Salmonella Typhi in Bangladesh: A 24-year retrospective observational study (1999-2022).孟加拉国伤寒沙门氏菌的抗生素耐药趋势:一项 24 年回顾性观察研究(1999-2022 年)。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Oct 4;18(10):e0012558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012558. eCollection 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of recent outbreaks and the efficacy and safety of drugs approved for the treatment of infections.对近期疫情以及获批用于治疗感染的药物的疗效和安全性的系统评价。
IJID Reg. 2024 Dec 6;14:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100516. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Bactericidal versus bacteriostatic antibacterials: clinical significance, differences and synergistic potential in clinical practice.杀菌性与抑菌性抗菌药物:临床意义、差异及临床实践中的协同潜力
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Jan 3;80(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae380.
3
Salmonella Typhi Shedding and Household Transmission by Children With Blood Culture-Confirmed Typhoid Fever in Vellore, South India.南印度维洛尔的血培养确诊伤寒患儿的伤寒沙门氏菌脱落和家庭传播。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 23;224(Supple 5):S593-S600. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab409.
4
Response of extensively drug resistant Salmonella Typhi to treatment with meropenem and azithromycin, in Pakistan.巴基斯坦广泛耐药伤寒沙门氏菌对美罗培南和阿奇霉素治疗的反应。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 15;14(10):e0008682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008682. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Treatment responses to Azithromycin and Ciprofloxacin in uncomplicated Salmonella Typhi infection: A comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Data from a Controlled Human Infection Model.治疗对阿奇霉素和环丙沙星在非复杂性伤寒沙门氏菌感染的应答:来自人体感染模型的临床和微生物学数据的比较。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Dec 26;13(12):e0007955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007955. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of a rapid diagnostic test (IgMFA) for uncomplicated typhoid fever in Cambodia.建立模型评估柬埔寨简易型伤寒快速诊断检测试剂(IgMFA)的成本效益。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 19;12(11):e0006961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006961. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Open label comparative trial of mono versus dual antibiotic therapy for Typhoid Fever in adults.成人伤寒单药与双联抗生素治疗的开放性标签对照试验。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 23;12(4):e0006380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006380. eCollection 2018 Apr.
8
Viral and Bacterial Etiology of Acute Diarrhea among Children under 5 Years of Age in Wuhan, China.中国武汉5岁以下儿童急性腹泻的病毒和细菌病因
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Aug 20;129(16):1939-44. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187852.
9
Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections.侵袭性沙门氏菌感染的流行病学、临床表现、实验室诊断、抗菌药物耐药性及抗菌药物管理
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Oct;28(4):901-37. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-15.
10
Clinically and microbiologically derived azithromycin susceptibility breakpoints for Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A.伤寒沙门氏菌和甲型副伤寒沙门氏菌临床及微生物学来源的阿奇霉素敏感性断点
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2756-64. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04729-14. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Resistance to ciprofloxacin in pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae in England and Wales in 1996.1996年英格兰和威尔士致病性肠杆菌科细菌对环丙沙星的耐药性
J Clin Pathol. 1997 Dec;50(12):1027-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.12.1027.
2
Quinolone-resistant Salmonella typhi in Viet Nam: molecular basis of resistance and clinical response to treatment.越南耐喹诺酮伤寒沙门氏菌:耐药的分子基础及治疗的临床反应
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;25(6):1404-10. doi: 10.1086/516128.
3
Salmonella isolated from humans, animals and other sources in Canada, 1983-92.1983年至1992年从加拿大的人类、动物和其他来源分离出的沙门氏菌。
Epidemiol Infect. 1997 Aug;119(1):15-23. doi: 10.1017/s0950268897007577.
4
Comparison of clinical features and pathologic findings in fatal cases of typhoid fever during the initial and later stages of the disease.伤寒热致死病例疾病初期与后期临床特征及病理发现的比较。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 May;56(5):490-3. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.56.490.
5
Multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhi: a worldwide epidemic.多重耐药性伤寒沙门氏菌:全球流行。
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Jan;24 Suppl 1:S106-9. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s106.
6
Uptake of azithromycin by various cells and its intracellular activity under in vivo conditions.阿奇霉素在体内条件下被各种细胞摄取及其细胞内活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jan;40(1):75-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.1.75.
7
Efficacy of azithromycin for typhoid fever.
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Oct;21(4):1045-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.4.1045.
8
Multi-drug resistant typhoid: a global problem.多重耐药伤寒:一个全球性问题。
J Med Microbiol. 1996 May;44(5):317-9. doi: 10.1099/00222615-44-5-317.
9
Randomized clinical trial of furazolidone for typhoid fever in children.呋喃唑酮治疗儿童伤寒的随机临床试验。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Feb;28(2):168-72. doi: 10.3109/00365529309096065.
10
Comparative efficacies of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin against experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Feb;31(2):313-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.2.313.