Suppr超能文献

在埃及进行的一项随机试验中,阿奇霉素与环丙沙星治疗无并发症伤寒热的疗效对比,该试验纳入了多重耐药患者。

Azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in a randomized trial in Egypt that included patients with multidrug resistance.

作者信息

Girgis N I, Butler T, Frenck R W, Sultan Y, Brown F M, Tribble D, Khakhria R

机构信息

U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1441-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1441.

Abstract

To compare clinical and bacteriological efficacies of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin for typhoid fever, 123 adults with fever and signs of uncomplicated typhoid fever were entered into a randomized trial. Cultures of blood were positive for Salmonella typhi in 59 patients and for S. paratyphi A in 3 cases; stool cultures were positive for S. typhi in 11 cases and for S. paratyphi A in 1 case. Multiple-drug resistance (MDR; resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) was present in isolates of 21 of 64 patients with positive cultures. Of these 64 patients, 36 received 1 g of azithromycin orally once on the first day, followed by 500 mg given orally once daily on the next 6 days; 28 patients received 500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally twice daily for 7 days. Blood cultures were repeated on days 4 and 10 after the start of therapy, and stool cultures were done on days 4, 10, and 28 after the start of therapy. All patients in both groups improved during therapy and were cured. Defervescence (maximum daily temperatures of </=38 degrees C) occurred at the following times [mean +/- standard deviation (range)] after the start of therapy: 3.8 +/- 1.1 (2 to 7) days with azithromycin and 3.3 +/- 1.0 (1 to 5) days with ciprofloxacin. No relapses were detected. Cultures of blood and stool during and after therapy were negative in all cases, except for one patient treated with azithromycin who had a positive blood culture on day 4. These results indicated that azithromycin and ciprofloxacin were similarly effective, both clinically and bacteriologically, against typhoid fever caused by both sensitive organisms and MDR S. typhi.

摘要

为比较阿奇霉素和环丙沙星治疗伤寒的临床及细菌学疗效,123例有发热及非复杂性伤寒体征的成人患者进入一项随机试验。59例患者血培养伤寒沙门菌阳性,3例副伤寒甲沙门菌阳性;11例患者粪便培养伤寒沙门菌阳性,1例副伤寒甲沙门菌阳性。64例培养阳性患者中,21例分离株存在多重耐药(对氨苄西林、氯霉素和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑耐药)。这64例患者中,36例在第1天口服1g阿奇霉素1次,随后在接下来6天每天口服500mg;28例患者口服环丙沙星500mg,每日2次,共7天。治疗开始后第4天和第10天重复血培养,治疗开始后第4天、第10天和第28天进行粪便培养。两组所有患者在治疗期间均有改善并治愈。治疗开始后,退热(最高日体温≤38℃)出现时间如下[均数±标准差(范围)]:阿奇霉素组为3.8±1.1(2至7)天,环丙沙星组为3.3±1.0(1至5)天。未检测到复发。除1例接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者在第4天血培养阳性外,治疗期间及治疗后的血培养和粪便培养在所有病例中均为阴性。这些结果表明,阿奇霉素和环丙沙星在临床和细菌学方面对敏感菌及多重耐药伤寒沙门菌引起的伤寒同样有效。

相似文献

2
7
Frequency and Antibiotics Sensitivity Pattern of Culture-Positive Salmonella Typhi in Children.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Mar;33(3):303-307. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.03.303.
10
Trends in antimicrobial resistance amongst Salmonella Typhi in Bangladesh: A 24-year retrospective observational study (1999-2022).
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Oct 4;18(10):e0012558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012558. eCollection 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of recent outbreaks and the efficacy and safety of drugs approved for the treatment of infections.
IJID Reg. 2024 Dec 6;14:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100516. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Response of extensively drug resistant Salmonella Typhi to treatment with meropenem and azithromycin, in Pakistan.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 15;14(10):e0008682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008682. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of a rapid diagnostic test (IgMFA) for uncomplicated typhoid fever in Cambodia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 19;12(11):e0006961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006961. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
Open label comparative trial of mono versus dual antibiotic therapy for Typhoid Fever in adults.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Apr 23;12(4):e0006380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006380. eCollection 2018 Apr.
8
Viral and Bacterial Etiology of Acute Diarrhea among Children under 5 Years of Age in Wuhan, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Aug 20;129(16):1939-44. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187852.
10
Clinically and microbiologically derived azithromycin susceptibility breakpoints for Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2756-64. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04729-14. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Resistance to ciprofloxacin in pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae in England and Wales in 1996.
J Clin Pathol. 1997 Dec;50(12):1027-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.12.1027.
3
Salmonella isolated from humans, animals and other sources in Canada, 1983-92.
Epidemiol Infect. 1997 Aug;119(1):15-23. doi: 10.1017/s0950268897007577.
5
Multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhi: a worldwide epidemic.
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Jan;24 Suppl 1:S106-9. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s106.
6
Uptake of azithromycin by various cells and its intracellular activity under in vivo conditions.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jan;40(1):75-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.1.75.
7
Efficacy of azithromycin for typhoid fever.
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Oct;21(4):1045-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.4.1045.
8
Multi-drug resistant typhoid: a global problem.
J Med Microbiol. 1996 May;44(5):317-9. doi: 10.1099/00222615-44-5-317.
9
Randomized clinical trial of furazolidone for typhoid fever in children.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Feb;28(2):168-72. doi: 10.3109/00365529309096065.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验