Motherby H, Nadjari B, Friegel P, Kohaus J, Ramp U, Böcking A
Institute of Cytopathology, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diagn Cytopathol. 1999 Jun;20(6):350-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199906)20:6<350::aid-dc5>3.0.co;2-7.
The aim of this investigation was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of conventional effusion cytology. Cytological diagnoses of 300 pleural effusions and 300 ascites were compared with clinical and/or histological follow-ups of the respective patients. Sensitivity of our cytological diagnoses on pleural effusions was 50.0%, specificity 97.0%, positive predictive value 95.7%, and negative predictive value 86.4%. Sensitivity in ascitic effusions was 62.4%, specificity 98.0%, positive predictive value 100.0%, and negative predictive value 88.3%; 5.8% of diagnoses for pleural and 4.4% for peritoneal effusions were suspicious or doubtful. The overall false-positive rate was 0.5%, while the false-negative rate was 31.5%. False-negative results were due to sampling errors in 71% of pleural and 73% of peritoneal effusions and to screening errors in 29% and 27%, respectively. Our data and those from the literature show that diagnostic accuracy of effusion cytology is still unsatisfactory and should be improved. Therefore, the use of different adjuvant methods is recommended.
本研究的目的是报告传统积液细胞学检查的诊断准确性。将300例胸腔积液和300例腹水的细胞学诊断结果与相应患者的临床和/或组织学随访结果进行比较。我们对胸腔积液的细胞学诊断敏感性为50.0%,特异性为97.0%,阳性预测值为95.7%,阴性预测值为86.4%。腹水的敏感性为62.4%,特异性为98.0%,阳性预测值为100.0%,阴性预测值为88.3%;胸腔积液诊断中有5.8%、腹腔积液诊断中有4.4%为可疑或不确定。总体假阳性率为0.5%,假阴性率为31.5%。假阴性结果中,71%的胸腔积液和73%的腹腔积液是由于采样误差,分别有29%和27%是由于筛查误差。我们的数据以及文献数据表明,积液细胞学检查的诊断准确性仍不尽人意,应予以提高。因此,建议采用不同的辅助方法。