Léonard A, Gerber G B, Stecca C, Rueff J, Borba H, Farmer P B, Sram R J, Czeizel A E, Kalina I
Teratogenicity and Mutagenicity Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 72, UCL 7237, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Mutat Res. 1999 May;436(3):263-83. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00006-x.
Acrylonitrile (AN) is an important intermediary for the synthesis of a variety of organic products, such as artificial fibres, household articles and resins. Although acute effects are the primary concern for an exposure to AN, potential genotoxic, carcinogenic and teratogenic risks of AN have to be taken seriously in view of the large number of workers employed in such industries and the world-wide population using products containing and possibly liberating AN. An understanding of the effect of acrylonitrile must be based on a characterization of its metabolism as well as of the resulting products and their genotoxic properties. Tests for mutagenicity in bacteria have in general been positive, those in plants and on unscheduled DNA synthesis doubtful, and those on chromosome aberrations in vivo negative. Wherever positive results had been obtained, metabolic activation of AN appeared to be a prerequisite. The extent to which such mutagenic effects are significant in man depends, however, also on the conditions of exposure. It appears from the limited data that the ultimate mutagenic factor(s), such as 2-cyanoethylene oxide, may have little opportunity to act under conditions where people are exposed because it is formed only in small amounts and is rapidly degraded. The carcinogenic action of AN has been evaluated by various agencies and ranged from 'reasonably be anticipated to be a human carcinogen' to 'cannot be excluded', the most recent evaluation being 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'. Animal data that confirm the carcinogenic potential of AN have certain limitations with respect to the choice of species, type of tumors and length of follow up. Epidemiological studies which sometimes, but not always, yielded positive results, encounter the usual difficulties of confounding factors in chemical industries. Exposure of workers to AN should continue to be carefully monitored, but AN would not have to be considered a cancer risk to the population provided limitations on releases from consumer products and guidelines on AN in water and air are enforced. AN is teratogenic in laboratory animals (rat, hamster) at high doses when foetal/embryonic (and maternal) toxicity already is manifest. Pregnant workers should not be exposed to AN. In view of the small concentrations generally encountered outside plants, women not professionally exposed would appear not to be at risk of teratogenic effects due to AN. Future research should concentrate on the elucidation of the different degradation pathways in man and on epidemiological studies in workers including pregnant women, assessing also, if possible, individual exposure by bio-monitoring.
丙烯腈(AN)是合成多种有机产品的重要中间体,如人造纤维、家居用品和树脂。虽然急性影响是接触丙烯腈时的主要关注点,但鉴于此类行业雇佣的大量工人以及全球使用含丙烯腈且可能释放丙烯腈产品的人群,丙烯腈潜在的基因毒性、致癌性和致畸性风险必须予以重视。对丙烯腈影响的理解必须基于对其代谢、代谢产物及其基因毒性特性的表征。细菌致突变性测试总体呈阳性,植物和非程序性DNA合成测试结果存疑,体内染色体畸变测试结果为阴性。无论何处获得阳性结果,丙烯腈的代谢活化似乎都是一个先决条件。然而,这种致突变作用在人类中的显著程度还取决于接触条件。从有限的数据来看,最终的致突变因素,如2-氰基环氧乙烷,在人们接触的条件下可能很少有机会起作用,因为它仅少量形成且迅速降解。丙烯腈的致癌作用已由多个机构进行评估,范围从“合理预期为人类致癌物”到“不能排除”,最近的评估是“可能对人类致癌”。证实丙烯腈致癌潜力的动物数据在物种选择、肿瘤类型和随访时间方面存在一定局限性。流行病学研究有时(但并非总是)得出阳性结果,遇到了化工行业中常见的混杂因素难题。应继续仔细监测工人接触丙烯腈的情况,但如果对消费品释放量加以限制并执行水中和空气中丙烯腈的指导标准,丙烯腈就不必被视为对人群的癌症风险。高剂量时,丙烯腈在实验动物(大鼠、仓鼠)中具有致畸性,此时胎儿/胚胎(以及母体)毒性已经显现。怀孕工人不应接触丙烯腈。鉴于工厂外通常遇到的浓度较低,非职业接触的女性似乎没有因丙烯腈而产生致畸作用的风险。未来的研究应集中于阐明人体中的不同降解途径以及对包括孕妇在内的工人进行流行病学研究,如有可能,还应通过生物监测评估个体接触情况。