Fetsch T, Burschel G, Breithardt G, Engberding R, Koch H P, Lukl J, Trappe H J, Treese N
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Innere Medizin C, Münster.
Z Kardiol. 1999 Mar;88(3):195-207. doi: 10.1007/s003920050276.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia. However, despite manifold publications reflecting numerous clinical trials about treatment of AF, the management of this arrhythmia is still under controversial discussion, in daily clinical work as well as in research. The present study concentrates on three major questions: 1. How frequent are recurrences of AF in long-term follow-up? Most of the previous studies used the occurrence of symptoms as a surrogate parameter for recurrences of AF, despite the expected high rate of asymptomatic relapses. In the present study a daily transtelephonic ECG transmission enables a rhythm monitoring independent of symptoms. 2. Is the frequency of AF recurrences significantly reduced by antiarrhythmic medication? A direct comparison of class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs, which still are most frequently used for this indication, and of placebo will answer this question. 3. How safe is the long-term treatment for the prevention of AF recurrences with special respect to proarrhythmic effects? The daily transtelephonic ECG transmission enables a quantitative and qualitative monitoring of tachy- and bradyarrhythmias independent of symptoms. Additionally, the daily analysis of ECG measures may detect parameters predicting subsequent life threatening arrhythmias. The study design provides a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter parallel group comparison. In Germany and in the Czech Republic about 90 hospitals will include 900 patients with documented chronic AF, age 18 to 80 years, if they are eligible for electrical cardioversion without concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy and if they are anticoagulated for at least three weeks prior to inclusion. Neither the size of the left atrium nor the duration of chronic AF are exclusion criteria. A few hours after successful electrical cardioversion the patients are randomised either to sotalol (2 x 160 mg) or quinidine + verapamil (3 x 160 mg + 3 x 80 mg) or placebo. Starting at the day after cardioversion, the patient is asked to record and transmit electrocardiograms of one minute duration at least once a day using his personal transtelephonic ECG recording unit (Tele-ECG recorder, credit card size), in case of symptoms as often as necessary. The ECGs can be transmitted at any time by any regular phone without additional equipment using a toll free number. A custom made, computer based, fully automated receiving centre is handling the patient calls interactively with voice control, including a voice recording of the patient's symptoms. The ECG tracings and the patient's voice messages are subsequently computer based analysed by experienced technicians. All ECG measures are stored in a database. In case of AF recurrence, any other relevant arrhythmia or additional abnormalities (e.g. QT prolongation) the correspondent hospital is immediately informed by fax. In case of AF recurrence, a subsequent Holter recording discriminates in paroxysmal and permanent AF. Study medication is ended if either permanent AF or the third episode of paroxysmal AF are detected or after 12 months of follow-up. Regular follow-up visits are performed monthly. Major endpoints are the time to first recurrence of AF or the time to death, secondary parameters are the number of AF recurrences, the time to end of medication and AF related symptoms. The recruitment started in the last days of 1996. Until the end of June 1998, 424 patients have been randomised. It is expected to end recruitment in spring 1999 and to close the study in spring 2000. Final results will be available in summer 2000.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律失常。然而,尽管有大量反映房颤治疗临床试验的出版物,但无论是在日常临床工作还是研究中,这种心律失常的管理仍处于有争议的讨论中。本研究集中在三个主要问题上:1. 长期随访中房颤复发的频率有多高?以前的大多数研究将症状的出现作为房颤复发的替代参数,尽管预计无症状复发率很高。在本研究中,每日电话传输心电图能够独立于症状进行心律监测。2. 抗心律失常药物是否能显著降低房颤复发的频率?对仍最常用于此适应症的I类和III类抗心律失常药物与安慰剂进行直接比较将回答这个问题。3. 就促心律失常作用而言,预防房颤复发的长期治疗有多安全?每日电话传输心电图能够独立于症状对快速性和缓慢性心律失常进行定量和定性监测。此外,每日心电图测量分析可能检测到预测随后危及生命的心律失常的参数。该研究设计为前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心平行组比较。在德国和捷克共和国,约90家医院将纳入900例有记录的慢性房颤患者,年龄在18至80岁之间,前提是他们符合无需同时使用抗心律失常药物治疗即可进行电复律的条件,并且在纳入前至少抗凝三周。左心房大小和慢性房颤持续时间均不是排除标准。成功电复律后数小时,患者被随机分为索他洛尔组(2×160mg)、奎尼丁+维拉帕米组(3×160mg+3×80mg)或安慰剂组。从复律后的第二天开始,要求患者使用其个人电话心电图记录装置(电话心电图记录仪,信用卡大小),每天至少记录并传输一次持续一分钟的心电图,如有症状则根据需要随时记录。心电图可通过任何普通电话在任何时间使用免费号码进行传输,无需额外设备。一个定制的、基于计算机的全自动接收中心通过语音控制与患者进行交互通话,包括记录患者的症状语音。心电图记录和患者的语音信息随后由经验丰富的技术人员进行计算机分析。所有心电图测量结果都存储在数据库中。如果发生房颤复发、任何其他相关心律失常或其他异常情况(如QT延长),将立即通过传真通知相关医院。如果发生房颤复发,随后的动态心电图记录可区分阵发性房颤和永久性房颤。如果检测到永久性房颤或阵发性房颤的第三次发作,或在随访12个月后,研究用药结束。每月进行定期随访。主要终点是首次房颤复发时间或死亡时间,次要参数是房颤复发次数、用药结束时间和房颤相关症状。招募工作于1996年最后几天开始。截至1998年6月底,已有424例患者被随机分组。预计1999年春季结束招募,2000年春季结束研究。最终结果将于2000年夏季公布。