Fetsch Thomas, Bauer Peter, Engberding Rolf, Koch Hans P, Lukl Jan, Meinertz Thomas, Oeff Michael, Seipel Ludger, Trappe Hans J, Treese Norbert, Breithardt Günter
Universitätsklinik Münster, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik C, D-48129, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2004 Aug;25(16):1385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.015.
In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), the efficacy and safety of two anti-arrhythmic drugs in preventing the recurrence of AF after successful direct current (DC) cardioversion was prospectively assessed in a multi-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial using daily trans-telephonic monitoring.
1182 patients with persistent AF were prospectively enrolled, 848 patients were successfully cardioverted and then randomised to either sotalol (383 patients), quinidine plus verapamil (377 patients) or placebo (88 patients). The primary outcome parameter was AF recurrence or death. All patients received an event recorder (Tele-ECG) and had to record and transmit via telephone at least one ECG per day during follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 266 days. A total of 191,103 Tele-ECGs were recorded and transmitted. The primary outcome parameter (AF recurrence of any kind or death) was observed in 572 patients (67%) in whom at least one episode of AF recurrence was documented during follow-up, in 348 patients (41%) AF recurrence was persistent. The recurrence rates after one year for any AF were 83% for placebo, 67% for sotalol and 65% for quinidine plus verapamil, the latter being statistically superior to placebo but not different from sotalol. The recurrence rates for the secondary outcome parameter persistent AF were 77%, 49% and 38%, respectively. Quinidine plus verapamil was significantly superior to placebo and to sotalol. About 95% of all AF recurrences were initially detected in the daily Tele-ECG, about 70% of all AF recurrences occurred completely asymptomatic. Adverse events on sotalol and quinidine plus verapamil were comparable with the exception that all torsade de pointes tachycardias occurred on sotalol.
Anti-arrhythmic treatment after DC cardioversion of persistent AF significantly decreases the recurrence rates of persistent AF compared to placebo with superiority of quinidine plus verapamil compared to sotalol. Symptoms were not reliable as clinical surrogates to detect episodes of AF.
在持续性心房颤动(AF)患者中,通过每日电话远程监测,在一项多中心双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验中前瞻性评估两种抗心律失常药物在成功直流电(DC)复律后预防AF复发的有效性和安全性。
前瞻性纳入1182例持续性AF患者,848例患者成功复律,然后随机分为索他洛尔组(383例患者)、奎尼丁加维拉帕米组(377例患者)或安慰剂组(88例患者)。主要结局参数为AF复发或死亡。所有患者均接受事件记录仪(Tele-ECG),并在随访期间每天至少记录并通过电话传输一份心电图。平均随访期为266天。共记录并传输了191,103份Tele-ECG。在572例患者(67%)中观察到主要结局参数(任何类型的AF复发或死亡),其中在随访期间记录到至少一次AF复发,在348例患者(41%)中AF复发持续存在。安慰剂组、索他洛尔组和奎尼丁加维拉帕米组一年后任何AF的复发率分别为83%、67%和65%,后两者在统计学上优于安慰剂,但与索他洛尔无差异。次要结局参数持续性AF的复发率分别为77%、49%和38%。奎尼丁加维拉帕米显著优于安慰剂和索他洛尔。所有AF复发中约95%最初在每日Tele-ECG中被检测到,所有AF复发中约70%完全无症状。索他洛尔和奎尼丁加维拉帕米的不良事件相当,唯一的例外是所有尖端扭转型室性心动过速均发生在索他洛尔组。
与安慰剂相比,持续性AF直流电复律后抗心律失常治疗显著降低了持续性AF的复发率,奎尼丁加维拉帕米比索他洛尔更具优势。症状作为检测AF发作的临床替代指标并不可靠。