Suppr超能文献

放宽决策标准并不能改善失忆症患者的识别记忆。

Relaxing decision criteria does not improve recognition memory in amnesic patients.

作者信息

Reber P J, Squire L R

机构信息

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1999 May;27(3):501-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03211544.

Abstract

An important question about the organization of memory is whether information available in non-declarative memory can contribute to performance on tasks of declarative memory. Dorfman, Kihlstrom, Cork, and Misiaszek (1995) described a circumstance in which the phenomenon of priming might benefit recognition memory performance. They reported that patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy improved their recognition performance when they were encouraged to relax their criteria for endorsing test items as familiar. It was suggested that priming improved recognition by making information available about the familiarity of test items. In three experiments, we sought unsuccessfully to reproduce this phenomenon in amnesic patients. In Experiment 3, we reproduced the methods and procedure used by Dorfman et al. but still found no evidence for improved recognition memory following the manipulation of decision criteria. Although negative findings have their own limitations, our findings suggest that the phenomenon reported by Dorfman et al. does not generalize well. Our results agree with several recent findings that suggest that priming is independent of recognition memory and does not contribute to recognition memory scores.

摘要

关于记忆组织的一个重要问题是,非陈述性记忆中可用的信息是否有助于陈述性记忆任务的表现。多尔夫曼、基尔斯特龙、科克和米西亚泽克(1995年)描述了一种情况,即启动现象可能有利于识别记忆表现。他们报告说,接受电休克治疗的患者在被鼓励放宽认可测试项目为熟悉的标准时,其识别表现有所改善。有人认为,启动通过提供有关测试项目熟悉程度的信息来提高识别能力。在三个实验中,我们未能在失忆症患者中重现这一现象。在实验3中,我们重现了多尔夫曼等人使用的方法和程序,但在操纵决策标准后,仍然没有发现识别记忆得到改善的证据。尽管否定性的研究结果有其自身的局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,多尔夫曼等人报告的现象并不能很好地推广。我们的结果与最近的几项研究结果一致,这些研究结果表明启动与识别记忆无关,并且对识别记忆分数没有贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验