• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于内隐记忆任务和外显记忆任务中遗忘现象的比较。

A comparison of forgetting in an implicit and explicit memory task.

作者信息

McBride D M, Dosher B A

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine 92697-5100, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Dec;126(4):371-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.4.371.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.126.4.371
PMID:9407648
Abstract

Among possible criteria for distinguishing separate memory systems for implicit and explicit memory is that of substantial differences in either the form or rate of forgetting. Prior literature has claimed both differential forgetting and equivalent forgetting for implicit and explicit tasks. Existing experimental data for word-stem completion and explicit control tasks were reviewed and shown to be inconclusive. Our experiments measure forgetting in comparable implicit and explicit memory tasks of stem completion and stem cued recall. The form and the rate of forgetting are essentially the same for these implicit and explicit tasks. Levels of processing and task conditions differ only in the level of initial learning or availability. Thus, either the implicit and explicit task reflect traces in the same memory system or they reflect traces in different systems that have identical forgetting dynamics.

摘要

区分内隐记忆和外显记忆的不同记忆系统的可能标准之一是遗忘形式或遗忘速率上的显著差异。先前的文献既声称内隐任务和外显任务存在差异遗忘,也声称存在等效遗忘。对词干补全和外显控制任务的现有实验数据进行了回顾,结果显示尚无定论。我们的实验测量了词干补全和词干线索回忆这两种可比的内隐和外显记忆任务中的遗忘情况。这些内隐和外显任务的遗忘形式和遗忘速率基本相同。加工水平和任务条件仅在初始学习水平或可得性上有所不同。因此,要么内隐任务和外显任务反映的是同一记忆系统中的痕迹,要么它们反映的是具有相同遗忘动态的不同系统中的痕迹。

相似文献

1
A comparison of forgetting in an implicit and explicit memory task.一项关于内隐记忆任务和外显记忆任务中遗忘现象的比较。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Dec;126(4):371-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.4.371.
2
Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.将词干补全和线索回忆作为检索时注意力分散的函数进行区分。
Memory. 2008 Oct;16(7):763-72. doi: 10.1080/09658210802261116.
3
A comparison of implicit memory tasks in Korsakoff and alcoholic patients.柯萨科夫综合征患者与酒精性患者内隐记忆任务的比较。
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1143-50. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00032-2.
4
Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.在多个保持间隔下用概念线索探究记忆:内隐和外显测试中遗忘率的比较
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):139-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03196150.
5
Adult age differences in implicit and explicit memory: time course and encoding effects.成人内隐记忆和外显记忆的年龄差异:时间进程与编码效应。
Psychol Aging. 1988 Dec;3(4):358-66. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.4.358.
6
Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.比较单词片段补全和字母线索提示下的线索回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):542-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.542.
7
Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting.回忆启动和词干补全启动具有不同的电生理关联,并且通过定向遗忘受到不同的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Nov;16(6):1021-32. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.6.1021.
8
A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.对提取诱发遗忘的一种限制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314.
9
Priming and aging: further evidence of preserved memory function.启动与老化:记忆功能保留的进一步证据。
Am J Psychol. 1991 Spring;104(1):89-100.
10
Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人的内隐记忆与外显记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):531-41. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.531.

引用本文的文献

1
The Italian Face-Name Association Test (ItFNAT): a preliminary validation of three parallel versions.意大利面孔-名字联想测验(ItFNAT):三个平行版本的初步验证
Neurol Sci. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08165-z.
2
Effect of levels-of-processing on rates of forgetting.加工水平对遗忘率的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):692-709. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01599-4. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
Memory from nonsense syllables to novels: A survey of retention.从无意义音节到小说的记忆:一项关于记忆保持的调查。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2437-2464. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02514-3. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
Inverse forgetting in unconscious episodic memory.无意识情节记忆中的反向遗忘。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 29;12(1):20595. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25100-w.
5
Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories.提取意图与遗忘:保持时间和线索鲜明度如何影响情节记忆的自动提取和主动提取。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):893-905. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00904-w.
6
Event models and the fan effect.事件模型与扇形效应
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):1028-1044. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0713-4.
7
Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.记忆系统并非以意识来划分:从激活与联结的角度重新诠释记忆。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):23-49. doi: 10.1037/a0013974.
8
Divergence of explicit and implicit processing speed during associative memory retrieval.联想记忆检索过程中显性与隐性加工速度的差异。
Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
9
Working memory and focal attention.工作记忆与集中注意力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 May;27(3):817-35.
10
Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.在多个保持间隔下用概念线索探究记忆:内隐和外显测试中遗忘率的比较
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):139-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03196150.