Setcos J C, Tarim B, Suzuki S
Turner Dental School, University of Manchester, England.
Quintessence Int. 1999 Mar;30(3):169-73.
There is a demand for more efficient and finer polishing of resin composite restorations. This study compared the use of some new systems, with new or reduced numbers of abrasive instruments, to polish representative resin composites.
Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, Sof-Lex Pop-On System, and Enhance Finishing and Polishing System were used to prepare the surfaces of blocks of seven different hybrid or microfilled resin composites. For each system, three instruments were used for 30 seconds each in a standard manner. The average surface roughness of the polished surfaces was determined by profilometer.
Visually, all surfaces were of clinically acceptable luster. By profilometer ranking, the Super-Snap Rainbow Kit produced the smoothest surfaces, followed by the Sof-Lex Pop-On System disks (which were not statistically different), and the Enhance System.
The Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit and Sof-Lex Pop-On System provided the smoothest surfaces for all the composites tested. For several composites, the Enhance System provided less smooth surfaces, but these were also clinically acceptable.
对树脂复合材料修复体进行更高效、精细的抛光存在需求。本研究比较了一些使用新型或数量减少的研磨器械的新系统对代表性树脂复合材料进行抛光的效果。
使用超扣彩虹技术套装、Sof-Lex 弹出式系统和增强型修整与抛光系统对七种不同的混合或微填料树脂复合材料块的表面进行处理。对于每个系统，以标准方式使用三种器械，每种器械使用30秒。通过轮廓仪测定抛光表面的平均粗糙度。
从视觉上看，所有表面的光泽在临床上均可接受。通过轮廓仪排名，超扣彩虹套装产生的表面最光滑，其次是 Sof-Lex 弹出式系统圆盘（二者无统计学差异），增强型系统排在最后。
超扣彩虹技术套装和 Sof-Lex 弹出式系统为所有测试的复合材料提供了最光滑的表面。对于几种复合材料，增强型系统提供的表面光滑度较低，但在临床上也是可接受的。
