Suppr超能文献

不同抛光系统和速度对树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。

Effect of different polishing systems and speeds on the surface roughness of resin composites.

作者信息

Tepe Hatice, Erdılek Ayse Dina, Sahın Merve, Efes Begüm Güray, Yaman Batu Can

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;26(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_395_22. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare surface roughness of a nano-spherical resin composite using four different multi-step polishing disc systems at five different speeds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 154 discs samples were prepared using a supra-nano spherical resin composite. The samples were divided into negative and positive control groups and the following four finishing and polishing disc systems: Sof-Lex, Bisco Finishing Discs, OptiDisc, and Super-Snap. Each polishing disc system was applied at five different speeds (2000, 5000, 10,000, 15,000, and 20,000 revolutions per minute [RPM]) ( = 7). The surface roughness of samples was measured using a profilometer. One sample from each group was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Two-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the average roughness (Ra) data from the profilometric experiments using statistical software (GraphPad Prism4-GraphPad Software; La Jolla, CA, USA). The mean values were compared using the Bonferroni test ( = 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean roughness ranged from 0.07 μm to 0.41 μm. The smoothest surfaces were obtained with OptiDisc at 20,000 RPM and Super-Snap at 20,000 RPM. The Bisco Finishing Discs group at 2,000 RPM showed the highest surface roughness values. For all polishing systems, the roughness at 20,000 RPM was lower than that at other speeds.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the polishing performance was in the following order: Super-Snap > OptiDisc > Sof-Lex > Bisco Finishing Discs. In addition, the surface roughness decreased as the polishing speed increased.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较使用四种不同的多步抛光盘系统在五种不同速度下的纳米球形树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度。

材料与方法

总共使用超纳米球形树脂复合材料制备了154个圆盘样品。将样品分为阴性和阳性对照组以及以下四种精修和抛光盘系统:Sof-Lex、Bisco精修盘、OptiDisc和Super-Snap。每个抛光盘系统以五种不同速度(每分钟2000、5000、10000、15000和20000转[rpm])使用( = 7)。使用轮廓仪测量样品的表面粗糙度。每组中的一个样品通过扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜进行评估。使用统计软件(GraphPad Prism4-GraphPad软件;美国加利福尼亚州拉霍亚)进行双向方差分析以评估来自轮廓测量实验的平均粗糙度(Ra)数据。使用Bonferroni检验( = 0.05)比较平均值。

结果

平均粗糙度范围为0.07μm至0.41μm。在20000 rpm下使用OptiDisc和在20000 rpm下使用Super-Snap获得了最光滑的表面。在2000 rpm下的Bisco精修盘组显示出最高的表面粗糙度值。对于所有抛光系统,20000 rpm时的粗糙度低于其他速度时的粗糙度。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,抛光性能顺序如下:Super-Snap > OptiDisc > Sof-Lex > Bisco精修盘。此外,表面粗糙度随着抛光速度的增加而降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75fa/10003290/9cff8817eae7/JCD-26-36-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验