Suppr超能文献

各种伯氏考克斯氏体抗原制剂通过不同检测方法检测血清抗体的适用性。

Suitability of various Coxiella burnetii antigen preparations for detection of serum antibodies by various tests.

作者信息

Kovácová E, Kazár J, Spanĕlová D

机构信息

Institute of Virology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

出版信息

Acta Virol. 1998 Dec;42(6):365-8.

Abstract

Comparison of four serological tests (complement fixation (CF) test, microagglutination (MA) test, microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)) for detection of post-infection antibody response in human and animal sera revealed a low sensitivity of the CF test with acute Q fever human, goat and sheep sera but not with chronic Q fever human sera and sera of aborting cows. The remaining three tests gave similar results with human (both acute and chronic) and cow sera, but the ELISA was more sensitive than the MA and MIF tests with goat and sheep sera. A treatment of phase I Coxiella burnetii (C.b.) cells with chloroform-methanol, potassium periodate and trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and mild acidic hydrolysis did not result in increase of the sensitivity of the tests when compared with the natural phase I and phase II C.b. cells, respectively. The suitability of various C.b. antigen preparations for the abovementioned serological tests with various sera is discussed.

摘要

对四种血清学检测方法(补体结合试验(CF)、微量凝集试验(MA)、微量免疫荧光试验(MIF)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA))检测人和动物血清中感染后抗体反应的比较显示,CF试验对急性Q热人、山羊和绵羊血清的敏感性较低,但对慢性Q热人血清和流产奶牛血清不低。其余三种检测方法对人(急性和慢性)和奶牛血清的结果相似,但ELISA对山羊和绵羊血清的敏感性高于MA和MIF试验。与天然I期和II期伯氏考克斯体(C.b.)细胞相比,用氯仿 - 甲醇、高碘酸钾和三氯乙酸(TCA)处理I期C.b.细胞以及温和酸性水解,并未提高检测的敏感性。讨论了各种C.b.抗原制剂对上述不同血清进行血清学检测的适用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验