Suppr超能文献

固相免疫酶分析(酶联免疫吸附测定)——一种用于诊断Q热的检测方法(与补体结合试验和免疫荧光法的比较)

[Solid-phase immunoenzyme analysis (ELISA)--a test for diagnosing Q fever (comparison with the complement fixation and immunofluorescence methods)].

作者信息

Kovacóvá E

出版信息

Tr Inst Im Pastera. 1989;66:119-26, 173.

PMID:2485296
Abstract

Purified phase I Coxiella burnetii corpuscles treated chemically in different ways (by potassium periodate, mild acid hydrolysis or trichloroacetic acid) were compared by ELISA for their ability to detect phase II (directed to antigen 2) and phase I (directed to antigen 1) antibodies in sera from human Q fever convalescents. As to the absorbance values, the most sensitive was the antigen obtained by mild acid hydrolysis (0.1 mol/l HCl for 30 min. at 100 degrees C), followed by phase I corpuscular antigen treated trichloroacetic acid. Phase I antigen treated by K10(4) gave lower absorbance values. The performances of the commonly used complement fixation test and the more recently developed indirect immunofluorescence test were compared on 45 human sera. Immunofluorescence revealed specific antibodies in 62.2% of the sera. In the complement fixation test only 2.2% of sera were positive. ELISA proved superior (76.8% positive sera) to the immunofluorescence and complement fixation tests in detection of Q fever.

摘要

采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法,比较经不同化学方法(高碘酸钾、弱酸水解或三氯乙酸)处理的纯化Ⅰ相伯纳特立克次体微粒检测人类Q热康复者血清中Ⅱ相(针对抗原2)和Ⅰ相(针对抗原1)抗体的能力。就吸光度值而言,最敏感的是经弱酸水解(0.1mol/L盐酸,100℃处理30分钟)获得的抗原,其次是经三氯乙酸处理的Ⅰ相微粒抗原。经高碘酸钾处理的Ⅰ相抗原吸光度值较低。对45份人类血清进行常用的补体结合试验和最新开发的间接免疫荧光试验,并比较其性能。免疫荧光显示62.2%的血清中有特异性抗体。补体结合试验中仅有2.2%的血清呈阳性。在检测Q热方面,ELISA法(76.8%血清呈阳性)优于免疫荧光法和补体结合试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验