Dolgin S E, Shlasko E, Gorfine S, Benkov K, Leleiko N
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 1999 May;34(5):837-9; discussion 839-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90383-4.
Controversies continue concerning the best way to perform restorative proctectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Can rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) withstand the challenge posed by extrarectal dissection with a double-stapled technique and no mucosectomy? Is a diverting ileostomy mandatory after RP?
The authors describe 30 consecutive children with UC who underwent RP with rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn IAA. The authors assess the results and compare the first 14 patients (group 1) treated with temporary diverting ileostomies with the next 16 consecutive patients (group 2) without diverting ileostomies.
The average age (13.8 years in group 1 v 10.4 in group 2), duration of illness before resection (3.2 years in group 1 v 1.5 in group 2), and gender breakdown (10 of 14 were girls in group 1, 10 of 16 were girls in group 2) were similar between the two groups. Outcome was not significantly different between the two groups. Average bowel movements per 24-hour period was 5.5 in group 1 and 4.2 in Group 2. Occasional nighttime staining occurred in two patients in group 1 and five in group 2. No one suffered daytime staining in group 1, and one patient had occasional daytime staining in group 2. Average quality of life (on a scale of 0 to 5) as assessed by the patients or parents was 4.4 in group 1 and 4.9 in group 2. There were 10 total complications in group 1. One child required a permanent stoma for ileoanal separation. Two patients required reoperations for complications caused by the diverting ileostomy. The single instance of peritonitis was in group 1 caused by anastomotic leak after ileostomy closure. There were five total complications in group 2, of which, two required temporary stomas for ileoanal separations.
RP with rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn IAA in children with UC provides good functional results. Peritonitis did not occur in the absence of diversion. Eliminating routine diverting ileostomy avoids the considerable complications and morbidity from the stoma and its closure.
关于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)行保留直肠黏膜的直肠切除术(RP)的最佳方式仍存在争议。直肠黏膜切除术及手工缝合回肠肛管吻合术(IAA)能否经受住不进行黏膜切除的双吻合器技术直肠外剥离术带来的挑战?RP术后是否必须行转流性回肠造口术?
作者描述了30例连续接受RP及直肠黏膜切除术和手工缝合IAA的UC患儿。作者评估结果,并将前14例接受临时性转流性回肠造口术治疗的患者(第1组)与接下来连续的16例未行转流性回肠造口术的患者(第2组)进行比较。
两组患者的平均年龄(第1组为13.8岁,第2组为10.4岁)、切除术前病程(第1组为3.2年,第2组为1.5年)及性别构成(第1组14例中有10例为女孩,第2组16例中有10例为女孩)相似。两组结局无显著差异。第1组24小时平均排便次数为5.5次,第2组为4.2次。第1组有2例患者偶尔出现夜间污粪,第2组有5例。第1组无患者出现日间污粪,第2组有1例患者偶尔出现日间污粪。患者或家长评估的平均生活质量(0至5分)第1组为4.4分,第2组为4.9分。第1组共发生10例并发症。1例患儿因回肠肛管分离需要永久性造口。2例患者因转流性回肠造口术引起的并发症需要再次手术。1例腹膜炎发生在第1组,由回肠造口关闭后吻合口漏引起。第2组共发生5例并发症,其中2例因回肠肛管分离需要临时性造口。
UC患儿行直肠黏膜切除术和手工缝合IAA的RP可取得良好的功能结果。未行转流时未发生腹膜炎。取消常规转流性回肠造口术可避免造口及其关闭带来的相当多的并发症和发病率。