Hollmann S, Klimmer F, Schmidt K H, Kylian H
Institute for Occupational Physiology at the University of Dortmund, Germany.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Apr;25(2):105-14. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.412.
Reliable, valid, and compatible methods are required for exploring the complex interactive effects of psychosocial and physical stressors on complaints and disorders. An instrument for assessing physical work load that integrates information from a biomechanical model of lumbar load is presented and validated.
Four hundred and fifty-five people working in nursing homes for elderly people in Germany filled out the developed questionnaire 3 times within 1 year. Test-retest reliability was calculated, and validity was checked several times. Relationships with other, theoretically related and unrelated variables were examined.
The test-retest reliability of the questionnaire measures was about 0.65. The convergent and discriminant validity was satisfactory, and the questionnaire was able to separate professional subgroups with different physical work loads. The Spearman rank-order correlations between physical load and musculoskeletal complaints were about 0.30.
The method developed in this study is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing physical work load. The integration of statistical methods from psychological testing and theory in the development of methods exploring the effects of physical work load is advocated.
探索心理社会压力源和身体压力源对主诉及疾病的复杂交互作用,需要可靠、有效且兼容的方法。本文介绍并验证了一种整合腰椎负荷生物力学模型信息的体力工作负荷评估工具。
德国455名在养老院照顾老年人的工作人员在1年内分3次填写了这份编制好的问卷。计算了重测信度,并多次检验效度。研究了该问卷与其他理论上相关和不相关变量之间的关系。
问卷测量的重测信度约为0.65。收敛效度和区分效度令人满意,该问卷能够区分不同体力工作负荷的职业亚组。身体负荷与肌肉骨骼主诉之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关约为0.30。
本研究开发的方法是一种评估体力工作负荷的可靠且有效的工具。提倡在探索体力工作负荷影响的方法开发中整合心理测试和理论的统计方法。