Janicke D M, Finnev J W
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 1999 Apr;24(2):115-27. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/24.2.115.
To review the status of empirically supported treatments for recurrent abdominal pain (RAP).
We identified studies based on literature search and contact with experts in the field and evaluated studies based on guidelines modified from the criteria established by the Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures.
Nine published intervention studies were identified that fell into three distinctive approaches: operant procedures, fiber treatments, and cognitive-behavioral treatments.
Operant procedures did not meet even the most lenient category (promising intervention) of the guidelines. Fiber treatment for RAP associated with constipation met the criteria for a promising intervention. Cognitive-behavioral treatment met the criteria for a probably efficacious intervention. We discuss implications and offer recommendations for future intervention research.
回顾复发性腹痛(RAP)经验证有效的治疗方法的现状。
我们通过文献检索和与该领域专家联系来确定研究,并根据从心理治疗推广与传播特别工作组制定的标准修改而来的指南对研究进行评估。
共确定了9项已发表的干预研究,这些研究分为三种不同的方法:操作性程序、纤维治疗和认知行为治疗。
操作性程序甚至未达到指南中最宽松的类别(有前景的干预措施)。针对与便秘相关的RAP的纤维治疗符合有前景的干预措施的标准。认知行为治疗符合可能有效的干预措施的标准。我们讨论了其意义并为未来的干预研究提供了建议。