Koblinsky M A, Campbell O, Heichelheim J
MotherCare/JSI, Arlington, Virginia 22209-3100, USA.
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(5):399-406.
The various means of delivering essential obstetric services are described for settings in which the maternal mortality ratio is relatively low. This review yields four basic models of care, which are best described by organizational characteristics relating to where women give birth and who performs deliveries. In Model 1, deliveries are conducted at home by a community member who has received brief training. In Model 2, delivery takes place at home but is performed by a professional. In Model 3, delivery is performed by a professional in a basic essential obstetric care facility, and in Model 4 all women give birth in a comprehensive essential obstetric care facility with the help of professionals. In each of these models it is assumed that providers do not increase the risk to women, either iatrogenically or through traditional practices. Although there have been some successes with Model 1, there is no evidence that it can provide a maternal mortality ratio under 100 per 100,000 live births. If strong referral mechanisms are in place the introduction of a professional attendant can lead to a marked reduction in the maternal mortality ratio. Countries using Models 2-4, involving the use of professional attendants at delivery, have reduced maternal mortality ratios to 50 or less per 100,000. However, Model 4, although arguably the most advanced, does not necessarily reduce the maternal mortality ratio to less than 100 per 100,000. It appears that not all countries are ready to adopt Model 4, and its affordability by many developing countries is doubtful. There are few data making it possible to determine which configuration with professional attendance is the most cost-effective, and what the constraints are with respect to training, skill maintenance, supervision, regulation, acceptability to women, and other criteria. A successful transition to Models 2-4 requires strong links with the community through either traditional providers or popular demand.
本文描述了在孕产妇死亡率相对较低的地区提供基本产科服务的各种方式。本综述得出了四种基本护理模式,最好通过与妇女分娩地点和接生人员相关的组织特征来描述。在模式1中,由接受过简短培训的社区成员在家中接生。在模式2中,在家中分娩但由专业人员接生。在模式3中,由专业人员在基本的基本产科护理设施中接生,在模式4中,所有妇女在专业人员的帮助下在全面的基本产科护理设施中分娩。在这些模式中的每一种中,都假定提供者不会因医源性因素或传统做法而增加妇女的风险。尽管模式1取得了一些成功,但没有证据表明它能将孕产妇死亡率降至每10万活产100例以下。如果建立了强有力的转诊机制,引入专业护理人员可显著降低孕产妇死亡率。采用模式2至4(包括在分娩时使用专业护理人员)的国家已将孕产妇死亡率降至每10万例50例或更低。然而,模式4虽然可以说是最先进的,但不一定能将孕产妇死亡率降至每10万例100例以下。似乎并非所有国家都准备好采用模式4,而且许多发展中国家是否能够负担得起也值得怀疑。几乎没有数据能够确定哪种有专业护理的配置最具成本效益,以及在培训、技能维持、监督、监管、妇女接受度和其他标准方面存在哪些限制。向模式2至4的成功过渡需要通过传统提供者或民众需求与社区建立紧密联系。