Meyer K, Hajric R, Westbrook S, Haag-Wildi S, Holtkamp R, Leyk D, Schnellbacher K
University Clinic, Bern, Switzerland.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 1;83(11):1537-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00143-5.
To increase muscle mass and strength in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), there is a need for implementing resistance exercises in exercise training programs. This study sought to assess the safety of rhythmic strength exercise with respect to left ventricular function in 9 patients with stable CHF, compared with 6 stable coronary patients with mild left ventricular dysfunction (control group). With use of right-sided catheterization, changes in left ventricular function were assessed during double leg press exercise at loads of 60% and 80% of maximum voluntary contraction. The exercise sessions lasted 14 minutes each, divided into work and recovery phases of 60/120 seconds. In CHF, during exercise at a 60% load, there was a significant increase in heart rate (mean +/- SEM 90 +/- 4 beats/min; p <0.05), mean arterial blood pressure (95 +/- 3 mm Hg; p <0.01), diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (20.2 +/- 2.7 mm Hg; p <0.01), and cardiac index (3 +/- 0.3 L/m2/min; p <0.05). Additionally, during leg press exercise at an 80% load, there was a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance (1,086 +/- 80 dynes x s x cm(-5); p <0.001), an increased cardiac index (3.4 +/- 0.1; p <0.001), and left ventricular stroke work index (75 +/- 5 g x m/m2; p <0.01), suggesting enhanced left ventricular function. Compared with controls, in CHF the magnitude of changes in hemodynamic parameters during exercise, demonstrated at a 60% load, was significantly smaller (systemic vascular resistance: [mean] 1,613 --> 1000 vs 1472 --> 1,247 dynes x s x cm(-5); cardiac index: 2.4 --> 3 vs 2.8 --> 4.4 L/m2/min, and stroke work index: 60 --> 69 vs 114 --> 155 g x m/m2; p <0.05 each). Nevertheless, changes indicated an enhanced contractile function of the left ventricle in CHF. This study demonstrates stability of left ventricular function during resistance exercise in well-compensated CHF patients with optimal drug therapy, as well as the appropriateness of the chosen mode and intensity applied as these factors relate to cardiovascular stress. This conclusion cannot be extrapolated to patients with less well-compensated heart failure, or to more protracted resistance training.
为增加慢性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的肌肉质量和力量,有必要在运动训练计划中实施抗阻运动。本研究旨在评估9例稳定型CHF患者进行节律性力量训练对左心室功能的安全性,并与6例轻度左心室功能不全的稳定型冠心病患者(对照组)进行比较。通过右侧心导管检查,在双腿推举运动中,分别以最大自主收缩量的60%和80%的负荷评估左心室功能的变化。每次运动持续14分钟,分为60/120秒的工作和恢复阶段。在CHF患者中,在60%负荷运动时,心率显著增加(平均±标准误90±4次/分钟;p<0.05),平均动脉血压(95±3mmHg;p<0.01),舒张期肺动脉压(20.2±2.7mmHg;p<0.01),以及心脏指数(3±0.3L/m²/min;p<0.05)。此外,在80%负荷的双腿推举运动中,全身血管阻力显著降低(1086±80达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵;p<0.001),心脏指数增加(3.4±0.1;p<0.001),左心室每搏功指数(75±5克·米/平方米;p<0.01),提示左心室功能增强。与对照组相比,CHF患者在60%负荷运动时血流动力学参数的变化幅度显著较小(全身血管阻力:[均值]1613→1000对比1472→1247达因·秒·厘米⁻⁵;心脏指数:2.4→3对比2.8→4.4L/m²/min,每搏功指数:60→69对比114→155克·米/平方米;各p<0.05)。然而,这些变化表明CHF患者左心室收缩功能增强。本研究表明,在接受最佳药物治疗的代偿良好的CHF患者中,抗阻运动期间左心室功能稳定,以及所选择的运动方式和强度与心血管应激相关时的适宜性。该结论不能外推至代偿较差的心力衰竭患者或更长时间的抗阻训练。