Schuurman R, Demeter L, Reichelderfer P, Tijnagel J, de Groot T, Boucher C
Department of Virology, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jul;37(7):2291-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.7.2291-2296.1999.
A panel (ENVA-1) of well-defined blinded samples containing wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase was analyzed by automated DNA sequencing in 23 laboratories worldwide. Drug resistance mutations at codons 41, 215, and 184 were present in the panel samples at different ratios to the wild type. The presence of mutant genotypes was determined qualitatively and quantitatively. All laboratories reported the presence of sequence heterogeneities at codons 41, 215, and 184 in one or more of the panel samples, though not all reported the correct codon genotypes. Two laboratories reported a mutant genotype in samples containing only the wild type, whereas two and three laboratories failed to detect the mutant genotypes at codons 41 and 215, respectively, in a completely mutant DNA population. Mutations present at relative concentrations of 25% of the total DNA population were successfully identified by 13 of 23, 10 of 23, and 16 of 23 labs for codons 41, 215, and 184Val, respectively. For more than 80% of those laboratories that qualitatively detected the presence of a mutation correctly, the estimated wild type/mutant ratio was less than 25% different from the input ratio in those samples containing 25 to 50% or 75% mutant input. This first multicenter study on the quality of DNA sequencing approaches for identifying HIV-1 drug resistance mutations revealed large interlaboratory differences in the quality of the results. The application of these procedures in their current state would in several cases lead to inaccurate or even incorrect diagnostic results. Therefore, proper quality control and standardization are urgently needed.
来自全球23个实验室通过自动DNA测序分析了一组(ENVA - 1)定义明确的盲样,其中包含野生型和突变型人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV - 1)逆转录酶。密码子41、215和184处的耐药性突变在该组样本中与野生型的比例各不相同。对突变基因型的存在进行了定性和定量测定。所有实验室均报告在一个或多个组内样本的密码子41、215和184处存在序列异质性,尽管并非所有实验室都报告了正确的密码子基因型。两个实验室在仅含野生型的样本中报告了突变基因型,而分别有两个和三个实验室在完全为突变型的DNA群体中未检测到密码子41和215处的突变基因型。对于密码子41、215和184Val,当突变体在总DNA群体中的相对浓度为25%时,分别有23个实验室中的13个、23个实验室中的10个和23个实验室中的16个成功鉴定出了这些突变。对于超过80%定性检测到突变存在的实验室,在那些含有25%至50%或75%突变体输入的样本中,估计的野生型/突变体比例与输入比例的差异小于25%。这项关于鉴定HIV - 1耐药性突变的DNA测序方法质量的首次多中心研究揭示了实验室间结果质量存在很大差异。以目前的状态应用这些程序在某些情况下会导致不准确甚至错误的诊断结果。因此,迫切需要适当的质量控制和标准化。