• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[全胃肠外营养中中心静脉导管常规定期更换的优势]

[Advantages of routine periodic replacement of the central endovenous catheter in total parenteral nutrition].

作者信息

González Avila G, Fajardo Rodríguez A

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, D. F. México.

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):67-70.

PMID:10364783
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of rutinary periodic replacement catheter of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) to prevent the incidence of catheter-related infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cancer patients admitted between Jan. 1, 1996 and Dec. 31, 1997, to receive TNP, were eligible for enrollment in the study. Placed a chateter of poliuretane with double lumen each patient for Nutrition Department. Replacement catheters done over a guidewire after ten days, with or without infection sings. Rates of catheter-related infection were documented for de novo, and guidewire exchanged catheters and analyzed relative risk for infection.

RESULTS

Twenty catheter-related infections developed in 140 patients. When the rate of catheter-associated infection was determined for each type of catheterization, the replacement catheter had a high observed rate of infection than either de novo type (19.5% vs 7.8%; p = 0.027). We found that the risk of developing a catheter-related infection in a de novo catheter was significantly less (p < 0.01).

摘要

目的

确定全胃肠外营养(TPN)常规定期更换导管预防导管相关感染发生率的效用。

材料与方法

1996年1月1日至1997年12月31日期间收治的接受TNP的癌症患者符合本研究入组条件。为每位患者在营养科放置一根双腔聚氨酯导管。10天后经导丝更换导管,无论有无感染迹象。记录初次置管、经导丝更换导管的导管相关感染发生率,并分析感染的相对风险。

结果

140例患者发生20例导管相关感染。当确定每种置管类型的导管相关感染率时,更换导管的感染发生率高于初次置管类型(19.5%对7.8%;p = 0.027)。我们发现初次置管发生导管相关感染的风险显著更低(p < 0.01)。

相似文献

1
[Advantages of routine periodic replacement of the central endovenous catheter in total parenteral nutrition].[全胃肠外营养中中心静脉导管常规定期更换的优势]
Nutr Hosp. 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):67-70.
2
Infectious rates of central venous pressure catheters: comparison between newly placed catheters and those that have been changed.中心静脉压导管的感染率:新置导管与更换后导管的比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1996 Sep;71(9):838-46. doi: 10.4065/71.9.838.
3
Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population.三腔与单腔中心静脉导管。对危重症人群的一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1139-43.
4
Simply a case of good practice. Avoiding catheter-related sepsis in total parenteral nutrition.仅仅是一个良好操作规范的案例。在全胃肠外营养中避免导管相关败血症。
Prof Nurse. 1993 Sep;8(12):775-9.
5
Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis.抗菌粘结未能预防中心静脉导管相关感染和败血症。
Am Surg. 1996 Aug;62(8):641-6.
6
Risk of colonization of central venous catheters: catheters for total parenteral nutrition vs other catheters.中心静脉导管定植风险:全胃肠外营养用导管与其他导管的比较
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Jul;12(4):328-35.
7
Microbiology difference between colonized catheters and catheter-related bloodstream infections.定植导管与导管相关血流感染之间的微生物学差异。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):1821-4.
8
[Hickman catheter for long-term parenteral therapy. A prospective interdisciplinary study].
Med Klin (Munich). 1992 Aug 15;87(8):412-7.
9
Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.通过锁骨下静脉或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管为住院患者提供肠外营养所带来的并发症及费用。
Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;19(4):237-43. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0103.
10
Use of Broviac/Hickman catheter for long-term venous access in pediatric cancer patients.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jun;18(2):143-8.