• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠超声检查、盆腔计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在直肠癌术前分期中的比较研究

Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

作者信息

Kim N K, Kim M J, Yun S H, Sohn S K, Min J S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Jun;42(6):770-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02236933.

DOI:10.1007/BF02236933
PMID:10378601
Abstract

PURPOSE

The preoperative assessment of rectal cancer wall invasion and regional lymph node metastasis is essential for the planning of optimal therapy. This study was done to determine the accuracy and clinical usefulness of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients with rectal cancer were examined with transrectal ultrasonography (n = 89), pelvic computed tomography (n = 69), and magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil (n = 73). The results obtained by these diagnostic modalities were compared with the histopathologic staging of specimens.

RESULTS

In staging depth of invasion, the overall accuracy was 81.1 percent (72/89) by transrectal ultrasonography, 65.2 percent (45/ 69) by computed tomography, and 81 percent (59/73) by magnetic resonance imaging. Overstaging was 10 percent (9/89) by transrectal ultrasonography, 17.4 percent (12/69) by computed tomography, and 11 percent (8/73) by magnetic resonance imaging; and understaging was 8 of 89 (8.9 percent) by transrectal ultrasonography, 12 of 69 (17.4 percent) by computed tomography, and 6 of 73 (8 percent) by magnetic resonance imaging. In staging lymph node metastasis, the overall accuracy rate was 54 of 85 (63.5 percent) in transrectal ultrasonography, 39 of 69 (56.5 percent) in computed tomography, and 46 of 73 (63 percent) in magnetic resonance imaging. The sensitivity was 24 of 45 (53.3 percent) in transrectal ultrasonography, 14 of 25 (56 percent) in computed tomography, and 33 of 42 (78.5 percent) in magnetic resonance imaging; and specificity was 30 of 40 (75.0 percent) in transrectal ultrasonography, 25 of 44 (56.8 percent) in computed tomography, and 13 of 31 (41.9 percent) in magnetic resonance imaging. The accuracy in detection of positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes under magnetic resonance imaging (n = 8) was 12.5 percent. The accuracy in detection of posterior vaginal wall invasion was 100 percent in transrectal ultrasonography (n = 7) and 100 percent in magnetic resonance imaging (n = 3), but 28.5 percent in computed tomography (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Both transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil exhibited similar accuracy and were superior to conventional computed tomography in preoperative assessment of depth of invasion and adjacent organ invasion. Because transrectal ultrasonography is a safer and more cost-effective modality than magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasonography is an appropriate method for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Further efforts will be needed to provide a better staging of lymph node involvement.

摘要

目的

直肠癌壁浸润及区域淋巴结转移的术前评估对于制定最佳治疗方案至关重要。本研究旨在确定经直肠超声、盆腔计算机断层扫描及磁共振成像在术前分期中的准确性及临床实用性。

方法

共89例直肠癌患者接受了经直肠超声检查(n = 89)、盆腔计算机断层扫描(n = 69)及直肠内线圈磁共振成像检查(n = 73)。将这些诊断方法所得结果与标本的组织病理学分期进行比较。

结果

在浸润深度分期方面,经直肠超声的总体准确率为81.1%(72/89),计算机断层扫描为65.2%(45/69),磁共振成像为81%(59/73)。经直肠超声过度分期为10%(9/89),计算机断层扫描为17.4%(12/69),磁共振成像为11%(8/73);经直肠超声分期不足为89例中的8例(8.9%),计算机断层扫描为69例中的12例(17.4%),磁共振成像为73例中的6例(8%)。在淋巴结转移分期方面,经直肠超声的总体准确率为85例中的54例(63.5%),计算机断层扫描为69例中的39例(56.5%),磁共振成像为73例中的46例(63%)。经直肠超声的敏感性为45例中的24例(53.3%),计算机断层扫描为25例中的14例(56%),磁共振成像为42例中的33例(78.5%);特异性方面,经直肠超声为40例中的30例(75.0%),计算机断层扫描为44例中的25例(56.8%),磁共振成像为31例中的13例(41.9%)。磁共振成像检测盆腔外侧阳性淋巴结(n = 8)的准确率为12.5%。经直肠超声(n = 7)和磁共振成像(n = 3)检测阴道后壁浸润的准确率均为100%,但计算机断层扫描(n = 7)的准确率为28.5%。

结论

经直肠超声和直肠内线圈磁共振成像在术前浸润深度及邻近器官浸润评估中显示出相似的准确性,且优于传统计算机断层扫描。由于经直肠超声比磁共振成像更安全且成本效益更高,因此经直肠超声是直肠癌术前分期的合适方法。还需要进一步努力以更好地对淋巴结受累情况进行分期。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.经直肠超声检查、盆腔计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在直肠癌术前分期中的比较研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Jun;42(6):770-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02236933.
2
Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI: accuracy and clinical usefulness.直肠癌MRI术前分期:准确性及临床应用价值
Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Dec;7(10):732-7. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0732-3.
3
Transrectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.经直肠超声检查在直肠癌术前分期中的应用
Yonsei Med J. 1994 Dec;35(4):396-403. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1994.35.4.396.
4
Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings.经直肠超声和直肠内磁共振成像对直肠癌的局部分期:与组织学结果的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Mar;43(3):338-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02258299.
5
[Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].[磁共振成像(0.5T)、计算机断层扫描和直肠内超声检查在直肠-乙状结肠肿瘤术前分期中的比较。与手术及解剖病理学结果的相关性]
Radiol Med. 1993 Jun;85(6):773-83.
6
How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer?直肠内超声在直肠癌术前分期中的准确性如何?
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Feb;36(2):127-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02051167.
7
Value and limits of endorectal ultrasonography for preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.直肠内超声检查在直肠癌术前分期中的价值与局限性
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Dec;8(6):438-44.
8
Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography and computed tomography for restaging rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation.术前放化疗后直肠内超声和计算机断层扫描对直肠癌再分期的准确性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jul;207(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
9
Accuracy of transrectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochemotherapy compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance in locally advanced rectal cancer.术前放化疗后经直肠超声与 CT 和 MRI 对局部进展期直肠癌的准确性比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;27(7):967-73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1419-5. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
10
Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound.直肠癌的局部分期:多层螺旋CT双对比造影及经直肠超声评估
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004 Jan-Feb;28(1):123-30. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200401000-00021.

引用本文的文献

1
Computed Tomography Scan and Clinical-based Complete Response Prediction in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Machine Learning Approach.新辅助放化疗后局部晚期直肠癌的计算机断层扫描与基于临床的完全缓解预测:一种机器学习方法
J Med Signals Sens. 2024 Dec 3;14:32. doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_46_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer with Deep Learning.基于深度学习的结直肠癌淋巴结转移术前预测
BME Front. 2022 Mar 16;2022:9860179. doi: 10.34133/2022/9860179. eCollection 2022.
3
Role of one-step nucleic acid amplification in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases detection.
一步法核酸扩增在结直肠癌淋巴结转移检测中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 14;28(30):4019-4043. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019.
4
Lateral pelvic lymph nodes for rectal cancer: A review of diagnosis and management.直肠癌的侧方盆腔淋巴结:诊断与管理综述
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):1412-1424. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i10.1412.
5
Radiological assessment of persistent retroperitoneal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: An analysis of the United States Rectal Cancer Consortium.新辅助治疗后直肠癌患者持续性腹膜后和侧盆淋巴结的放射学评估:美国直肠肿瘤学会分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):818-828. doi: 10.1002/jso.26600. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Association Between Three-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Findings and Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Observational Study.局部晚期直肠癌三维经直肠超声检查结果与新辅助放化疗肿瘤反应之间的关联:一项观察性研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 4;11:648839. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.648839. eCollection 2021.
7
Advance Rectal Cancer in a Young Patient: Should Screening Start Early?一名年轻患者的晚期直肠癌:筛查应尽早开始吗?
Cureus. 2019 Jul 22;11(7):e5195. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5195.
8
[Rational staging and follow-up of colorectal cancer : Do guidelines provide further help?].[结直肠癌的合理分期与随访:指南能提供更多帮助吗?]
Radiologe. 2019 Sep;59(9):820-827. doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-0578-6.
9
Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly Patient: The Role of Neo-adjuvant Therapy.老年患者的结直肠癌:新辅助治疗的作用
Open Med (Wars). 2019 Aug 14;14:607-612. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0068. eCollection 2019.
10
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Neoadjuvant Therapy on Decision Making: Cancer Center Experience and Literature Review.新辅助治疗后磁共振成像对局部进展期直肠癌的评估在决策中的应用:癌症中心经验及文献综述
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020 Mar;51(1):254-259. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00246-5.