Nichols J F, Morgan C G, Sarkin J A, Sallis J F, Calfas K J
Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, CA 92182-0171, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jun;31(6):908-12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00022.
The purposes of this study were to assess the validity and reliability of the Tritrac R3D accelerometer during treadmill walking and running and then to calibrate the instrument.
The Tritrac was assessed on 60 young adults (23.4 +/- 2.9 yr) during treadmill walking and running at 3.2, 6.4, and 9.7 km x h(-1). The calibration was carried out by identifying ranges of Tritrac raw data (vector magnitude) values corresponding to light (2-3.9 MET), moderate (4-7 MET), and vigorous (>7 MET) physical activity. Energy expenditure (EE), measured by indirect calorimetry, served as the criterion measure.
Interinstrument intraclass reliability coefficients for Tritracs worn on the right and left hip ranged from 0.73-0.87, while intersession coefficients demonstrated high reliability for all speeds (R = 0.87-0.92). Paired t-tests comparing mean accelerometer counts at 6.4 km x h(-1), 0% grade (2647 +/- 456), and 6.4 km x h(-1), 5% grade (2635 +/- 435) demonstrated no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mean differences between EE measured by indirect calorimetry and that estimated by the Tritrac ranged from 0.0082 kcal x kg(-1) x min(-1) at 3.2 km x h(-1) to 0.0320 kcal x kg(-1) x min(-1) at 9.7 km x h(-1), with the Tritrac consistently overestimating EE during horizontal treadmill walking. The relationship between vector magnitude and EE across all speeds was highly linear (R2 = 0.90, SEE = 0.014 kcal x kg(-1) x min(-1)), with little overlap between light, moderate, and vigorous categories. The mean vector magnitudes at 2, 4, and 7 MET were 650, 1772, and 3455, respectively.
These data indicate that the Tritrac is highly reliable from day to day and is sensitive to changes in speed but not grade. Furthermore, the Tritrac accurately distinguishes various intensities of walking and jogging on level ground. With limitations, these cut-points can be used to categorize light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity and to estimate EE.
本研究旨在评估Tritrac R3D加速度计在跑步机行走和跑步过程中的有效性和可靠性,然后对该仪器进行校准。
在60名年轻成年人(23.4±2.9岁)以3.2、6.4和9.7 km·h⁻¹的速度在跑步机上行走和跑步时对Tritrac进行评估。通过确定Tritrac原始数据(矢量大小)值对应于轻度(2 - 3.9代谢当量)、中度(4 - 7代谢当量)和剧烈(>7代谢当量)身体活动的范围来进行校准。通过间接测热法测量的能量消耗(EE)作为标准测量。
佩戴在右髋和左髋的Tritrac之间的仪器间组内可靠性系数范围为0.73 - 0.87,而不同测试阶段的系数在所有速度下均显示出高可靠性(R = 0.87 - 0.92)。配对t检验比较了6.4 km·h⁻¹、0%坡度(2647±456)和6.4 km·h⁻¹、5%坡度(2635±435)时的平均加速度计计数,结果显示无显著差异(P>0.05)。间接测热法测量的EE与Tritrac估算的EE之间的平均差异范围从3.2 km·h⁻¹时的0.0082 kcal·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹到9.7 km·h⁻¹时的0.0320 kcal·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,在水平跑步机行走过程中Tritrac始终高估EE。所有速度下矢量大小与EE之间的关系高度线性(R² = 0.90,标准误 = 0.014 kcal·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹),轻度、中度和剧烈类别之间几乎没有重叠。2、4和7代谢当量时的平均矢量大小分别为650、1772和3455。
这些数据表明Tritrac每天的可靠性都很高,并且对速度变化敏感但对坡度不敏感。此外,Tritrac能准确区分平地上不同强度的行走和慢跑。尽管有局限性,但这些切点可用于对轻度、中度和剧烈身体活动进行分类并估算EE。