Damian D L, Barnetson R S, Halliday G M
Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Sydney at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, NSW, Australia.
J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Jun;112(6):939-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00610.x.
This study investigates the relative effects of low-dose solar-simulated ultraviolet, ultraviolet A, and ultraviolet B radiation on the elicitation of contact hypersensitivity to nickel in nickel-allergic volunteers. A xenon arc lamp with changeable filters was used to irradiate groups of volunteers daily, on separate areas of their lower backs, with both solar-simulated ultraviolet (ultraviolet B, ultraviolet AII + ultraviolet AI) and ultraviolet A (same ultraviolet AII content but twice the ultraviolet AI as the solar-simulated ultraviolet spectrum) for 1 and 2 d; 3, 4, and 5 d; and from 1 to 4 wk. A fourth group was irradiated for 1-5 d with the ultraviolet B component of solar-simulated ultraviolet. Following the final irradiation in each group, nickel-containing patches were applied to both ultraviolet-treated sites and adjacent, unirradiated control sites. Erythema caused by nickel contact hypersensitivity at each site was quantitated 72 h later with a reflectance erythema meter. By comparing the nickel reactions of irradiated and unirradiated skin, ultraviolet immunosuppression was assessed with the different spectra and durations of ultraviolet exposure. We found significant immunosuppression with daily doses of ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A equivalent to approximately 6 min of summer sun exposure, and that ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B exerted their maximal immunosuppressive effects at different times. Solar-simulated ultraviolet-induced immunosuppression was significant after one exposure, near-maximal after two exposures and remained elevated thereafter. Ultraviolet B-induced immunosuppression was lower than that induced by solar-simulated ultraviolet, but followed a similar time-course. In contrast, ultraviolet A-induced immunosuppression was transient, peaking after three exposures. Immune responses returned towards normal with subsequent ultraviolet A exposure, suggesting that an adaptive mechanism may prevent immunosuppression by continued ultraviolet A irradiation.
本研究调查了低剂量太阳模拟紫外线、紫外线A和紫外线B辐射对镍过敏志愿者诱发镍接触性超敏反应的相对影响。使用带有可更换滤光片的氙弧灯,每天在志愿者下背部的不同区域,用太阳模拟紫外线(紫外线B、紫外线AII + 紫外线AI)和紫外线A(紫外线AII含量相同,但紫外线AI是太阳模拟紫外线光谱的两倍)照射1天和2天;3天、4天和5天;以及1至4周。第四组用太阳模拟紫外线的紫外线B成分照射1至5天。在每组最后一次照射后,将含镍贴片应用于紫外线处理部位和相邻的未照射对照部位。72小时后,用反射红斑仪对每个部位由镍接触性超敏反应引起的红斑进行定量。通过比较照射皮肤和未照射皮肤的镍反应,评估不同光谱和紫外线暴露持续时间的紫外线免疫抑制作用。我们发现,每日剂量相当于夏季阳光照射约6分钟的紫外线B和紫外线A会产生显著的免疫抑制作用,并且紫外线A和紫外线B在不同时间发挥其最大免疫抑制作用。太阳模拟紫外线诱导的免疫抑制在一次照射后显著,两次照射后接近最大并在此后保持升高。紫外线B诱导的免疫抑制低于太阳模拟紫外线诱导的免疫抑制,但遵循相似的时间进程。相比之下,紫外线A诱导的免疫抑制是短暂的,在三次照射后达到峰值。随后的紫外线A暴露使免疫反应恢复正常,这表明一种适应性机制可能会阻止持续的紫外线A照射导致的免疫抑制。