Ertel D
Vantage Partners, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 May-Jun;77(3):55-60, 62-70, 213.
Every company today exists in a complex web of relationships formed, one at a time, through negotiation. Purchasing and outsourcing contracts are negotiated with vendors. Marketing arrangements are negotiated with distributors. Product development agreements are negotiated with joint-venture partners. Taken together, the thousands of negotiations a typical company engages in have an enormous effect on both its strategy and its bottom line. But few companies think systematically about their negotiating activities as a whole. Instead they take a situational view, perceiving each negotiation to be a separate event with its own goals, tactics, and measures of success. Coordinating them all seems an overwhelming and impracticable job. In reality, the author argues, it is neither. A number of companies are successfully building coordinated negotiation capabilities by applying four broad changes in practice and perspective. First, they've established a company-wide negotiation infrastructure to apply the knowledge gained from forging past agreements to improve future ones. Second, they've broadened the measures they use to evaluate negotiators' performance beyond matters of cost and price. Third, they draw a clear distinction between the elements of an individual deal and the nature of the ongoing relationship between the parties. Fourth, they make their negotiators feel comfortable walking away from a deal when it's not in the company's best interests. These changes aren't radical steps. But taken together, they will let companies establish closer, more creative relationships with suppliers, customers, and other partners.
如今,每家公司都存在于一个通过谈判一次建立一个关系而形成的复杂关系网中。采购和外包合同是与供应商谈判达成的。营销安排是与经销商谈判达成的。产品开发协议是与合资伙伴谈判达成的。总体而言,一家典型公司所进行的数千次谈判对其战略和底线都有着巨大影响。但很少有公司将其谈判活动作为一个整体进行系统思考。相反,他们采取就事论事的观点,将每次谈判视为一个具有自身目标、策略和成功衡量标准的独立事件。协调所有这些谈判似乎是一项艰巨且不切实际的工作。作者认为,实际上并非如此。一些公司通过在实践和观念上进行四项广泛变革,成功地建立了协调谈判能力。首先,他们建立了全公司范围的谈判基础设施,以应用从达成过去协议中获得的知识来改进未来协议。其次,他们拓宽了用于评估谈判人员绩效的衡量标准,不再局限于成本和价格问题。第三,他们明确区分单个交易的要素和双方持续关系的性质。第四,当交易不符合公司最佳利益时,他们让谈判人员能够坦然放弃交易。这些变革并非激进举措。但综合起来,它们将使公司与供应商、客户及其他合作伙伴建立更紧密、更具创造性的关系。