Collis D J, Montgomery C A
Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 May-Jun;76(3):70-83.
What differentiates truly great corporate strategies from the merely adequate? How can executives at the corporate level create tangible advantage for their businesses that makes the whole more than the sum of the parts? This article presents a comprehensive framework for value creation in the multibusiness company. It addresses the most fundamental questions of corporate strategy: What businesses should a company be in? How should it coordinate activities across businesses? What role should the corporate office play? How should the corporation measure and control performance? Through detailed case studies of Tyco International, Sharp, the Newell Company, and Saatchi and Saatchi, the authors demonstrate that the answers to all those questions are driven largely by the nature of a company's special resources--its assets, skills, and capabilities. These range along a continuum from the highly specialized at one end to the very general at the other. A corporation's location on the continuum constrains the set of businesses it should compete in and limits its choices about the design of its organization. Applying the framework, the authors point out the common mistakes that result from misaligned corporate strategies. Companies mistakenly enter businesses based on similarities in products rather than the resources that contribute to competitive advantage in each business. Instead of tailoring organizational structures and systems to the needs of a particular strategy, they create plain-vanilla corporate offices and infrastructures. The company examples demonstrate that one size does not fit all. One can find great corporate strategies all along the continuum.
真正伟大的企业战略与仅仅过得去的战略有何区别?企业层面的高管如何为他们的业务创造切实的优势,使整体大于部分之和?本文提出了一个适用于多元化业务公司的价值创造综合框架。它探讨了企业战略最基本的问题:公司应该涉足哪些业务?如何协调跨业务的活动?公司总部应发挥什么作用?公司应如何衡量和控制绩效?通过对泰科国际(Tyco International)、夏普(Sharp)、纽威尔公司(Newell Company)以及盛世长城广告公司(Saatchi and Saatchi)的详细案例研究,作者证明,所有这些问题的答案很大程度上取决于公司特殊资源的性质——其资产、技能和能力。这些资源在一个连续体上分布,一端是高度专业化的,另一端是非常通用的。公司在这个连续体上的位置限制了它应该竞争的业务范围,并限制了其在组织设计方面的选择。应用这个框架,作者指出了企业战略错位导致的常见错误。公司错误地基于产品的相似性进入业务领域,而不是基于有助于在每个业务中获得竞争优势的资源。他们没有根据特定战略的需求来调整组织结构和系统,而是创建了千篇一律的公司总部和基础设施。这些公司案例表明,一种模式并不适用于所有情况。在这个连续体上处处都能找到伟大的企业战略。