• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创造企业优势。

Creating corporate advantage.

作者信息

Collis D J, Montgomery C A

机构信息

Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1998 May-Jun;76(3):70-83.

PMID:10179655
Abstract

What differentiates truly great corporate strategies from the merely adequate? How can executives at the corporate level create tangible advantage for their businesses that makes the whole more than the sum of the parts? This article presents a comprehensive framework for value creation in the multibusiness company. It addresses the most fundamental questions of corporate strategy: What businesses should a company be in? How should it coordinate activities across businesses? What role should the corporate office play? How should the corporation measure and control performance? Through detailed case studies of Tyco International, Sharp, the Newell Company, and Saatchi and Saatchi, the authors demonstrate that the answers to all those questions are driven largely by the nature of a company's special resources--its assets, skills, and capabilities. These range along a continuum from the highly specialized at one end to the very general at the other. A corporation's location on the continuum constrains the set of businesses it should compete in and limits its choices about the design of its organization. Applying the framework, the authors point out the common mistakes that result from misaligned corporate strategies. Companies mistakenly enter businesses based on similarities in products rather than the resources that contribute to competitive advantage in each business. Instead of tailoring organizational structures and systems to the needs of a particular strategy, they create plain-vanilla corporate offices and infrastructures. The company examples demonstrate that one size does not fit all. One can find great corporate strategies all along the continuum.

摘要

真正伟大的企业战略与仅仅过得去的战略有何区别?企业层面的高管如何为他们的业务创造切实的优势,使整体大于部分之和?本文提出了一个适用于多元化业务公司的价值创造综合框架。它探讨了企业战略最基本的问题:公司应该涉足哪些业务?如何协调跨业务的活动?公司总部应发挥什么作用?公司应如何衡量和控制绩效?通过对泰科国际(Tyco International)、夏普(Sharp)、纽威尔公司(Newell Company)以及盛世长城广告公司(Saatchi and Saatchi)的详细案例研究,作者证明,所有这些问题的答案很大程度上取决于公司特殊资源的性质——其资产、技能和能力。这些资源在一个连续体上分布,一端是高度专业化的,另一端是非常通用的。公司在这个连续体上的位置限制了它应该竞争的业务范围,并限制了其在组织设计方面的选择。应用这个框架,作者指出了企业战略错位导致的常见错误。公司错误地基于产品的相似性进入业务领域,而不是基于有助于在每个业务中获得竞争优势的资源。他们没有根据特定战略的需求来调整组织结构和系统,而是创建了千篇一律的公司总部和基础设施。这些公司案例表明,一种模式并不适用于所有情况。在这个连续体上处处都能找到伟大的企业战略。

相似文献

1
Creating corporate advantage.创造企业优势。
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 May-Jun;76(3):70-83.
2
Divestiture: strategy's missing link.资产剥离:战略中缺失的环节。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 May;80(5):74-83, 133.
3
Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy.基于能力竞争:企业战略新规则
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 Mar-Apr;70(2):57-69.
4
Tailored, not benchmarked. A fresh look at corporate planning.量身定制,而非对标。对企业规划的全新审视。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Mar-Apr;77(2):41-8, 50, 189.
5
The CEO as organizational architect: an interview with Xerox's Paul Allaire. Interview by Robert Howard.首席执行官作为组织架构师:对施乐公司的保罗·阿莱尔的访谈。罗伯特·霍华德采访。
Harv Bus Rev. 1992 Sep-Oct;70(5):106-21.
6
Competing with giants. Survival strategies for local companies in emerging markets.与巨头竞争。新兴市场本土企业的生存策略。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Mar-Apr;77(2):119-29, 187.
7
Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets.修补。在动态市场中重新缝合业务组合。
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 May-Jun;77(3):72-82, 208.
8
Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing.企业想象力与探索式营销。
Harv Bus Rev. 1991 Jul-Aug;69(4):81-92.
9
What's your strategy for managing knowledge?你管理知识的策略是什么?
Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Mar-Apr;77(2):106-16, 187.
10
Do you have a well-designed organization?你有一个设计完善的组织吗?
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Mar;80(3):117-24, 134.