Coffey DS
Urology, Oncology, Pharmacology and Molecular Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Oncologist. 1997;2(6):XI-XII.
Most Americans are or will be facing a threat more real than crimes or terrorism-it is the threat of cancer. Indeed, one-fourth of all Americans alive today will ultimately die from cancer. Yet the level of funding for cancer research in 1998 and beyond remains in doubt. The Senate Appropriations Committee has proposed a higher funding figure than the House and the difference will be resolved in negotiations this September. President Clinton has recommended a meager 2.5% increase in spending on cancer. This sum is simply not enough. Although Americans may fool themselves into thinking the government has been at war against cancer, the current funding ceiling for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget demonstrates that this so-called offensive is little more than a skirmish. Careful scrutiny of this budget reveals that every time a citizen pays ten dollars in taxes, only one penny goes to cancer research. What the government is spending in cancer research would not buy or maintain two stealth bombers-hardly evidence of a major military strike. For those of us fighting the deadly scourge of cancer, the 1,550 Americans killed each day by this disease are painful and enduring casualties. Imagine five fully loaded jumbo jets crashing with no survivors on the same day. These headlines would generate fast and effective calls for funding for improved safety regulations, and yet cancer takes this number of lives daily-and in one year more lives than all the U.S. combat fatalities in this century. And yet there is a virtual silence as Congress meets to determine the level of monies to direct to cancer research efforts which might halt this carnage. In the past, medical research stopped the horrors of pain associated with amputations and operations conducted without anesthesia, and research stopped the epidemic of polio and the massive deaths from typhoid fever. Soon research will stop the deaths from AIDS. Will cancer be prevented or cured within your lifetime? It should and can be, but only if Americans speak up and demand Congress do its part to advance promising research by supporting NIH and efforts to control cancer. Cancer has stricken almost every family and we urgently need more defense. We must not sit waiting quietly any longer. It is time for a wake-up call to arms, to declare a war effort that demands results. The U.S. paid thirty times more for the Gulf War than the annual budget allotment for cancer research, and five times more to maintain the space program. Today, three-fourths of all cancer research grants approved by critical scientific review still go inactive. These instances represent more lost opportunities, more lost time, more lost lives. We must do better than this. Cancer strikes at the heart and fabric of our society. For the 1.3 million Americans diagnosed with cancer this year, the cost to our economy will exceed $100 billion. Thus, the $2.4 billion now being spent on research is insufficient medically and morally. Several clear-sighted congressional leaders who understand the critical need for increased funding have worked to assure expanded resources for the NIH and for cancer research. Unfortunately, their voices are too often drowned out by legislators with different agendas. Even with limited funds, America's past 25 years of cancer research has paid off. We have already cured some types of cancers, especially those that strike our young people. From 1973 to 1990, the cancer death rate from birth to 19 years of age decreased 38%; from 20 to 40 years, 20%; and from 45 to 54 years, 10%. Over this same period, the government invested $56 million on testicular cancer research. This effort yielded a 91% cure rate and produced an annual savings of $166 million that will last forever. The financial investment was repaid in six months, and the victims have an increased life expectancy of 40 years. These examples and others are proof of the principle that the support of cancer research pays off. However, we have not yet won such hard-fought victories on the more prevalent forms of cancers such as breast, prostate, and lung. Whether it is by cure or prevention, cancers must also be controlled and it can only be accomplished through research. On December 23, 1971, President Richard Nixon signed the National Cancer Act that was to provide, ".a total commitment of Congress and the president. to provide the funds. for the conquest of cancer." Somewhere this contract with America got lost. We are now faced with more losses. The new upheaval in American medicine threatens clinical research in cancer investigation to test new therapies and to support the training of new research soldiers to join the battle. The bottom-line approach of insurance and managed care policies no longer cares about these essential components; they say it is no longer their responsibility. This loss of financial support, combined with the tepid endorsement of funding of research from the government, occurs just when there is an explosion of new discoveries and opportunities becoming available to attack cancer. It is time to dramatically increase our efforts and no time to retreat. If we really want to defend against the terrorism of cancer, we need to attack it with a real war effort. If we can go to Mars, we can go to war on cancer, but only if Americans can speak louder than their elected government leaders. They need to hear our opinion, now.
大多数美国人正在或将要面对一种比犯罪或恐怖主义更为真实的威胁——那就是癌症的威胁。事实上,如今在世的所有美国人中有四分之一最终将死于癌症。然而,1998年及以后的癌症研究资金水平仍不确定。参议院拨款委员会提出的资金数额高于众议院,二者的分歧将在今年9月的谈判中解决。克林顿总统建议仅将癌症研究支出提高2.5%。这笔钱根本不够。尽管美国人可能自欺欺人地认为政府一直在与癌症作斗争,但国立卫生研究院(NIH)预算的当前资金上限表明,这场所谓的攻势只不过是一场小冲突。仔细审查这份预算就会发现,每当一个公民缴纳10美元税款时,只有1美分用于癌症研究。政府在癌症研究上的支出甚至买不起或维持两架隐形轰炸机——这很难说是一场重大军事打击的证据。对于我们这些与癌症这一致命祸害作斗争的人来说,每天有1550名美国人死于这种疾病,他们是痛苦而持久的受害者。想象一下,同一天有五架满载乘客的大型喷气式客机坠毁且无人生还。这样的头条新闻会迅速引发要求为改善安全法规提供资金的有效呼声,然而癌症每天都夺走这么多人的生命——而且在一年里夺走的生命比本世纪美国所有战斗死亡人数还多。然而,当国会开会决定拨给癌症研究工作的资金水平,而这些研究工作可能会阻止这场大屠杀时,却几乎一片沉默。过去,医学研究终结了与截肢以及无麻醉手术相关的痛苦恐惧,研究遏制了小儿麻痹症的流行以及伤寒热导致的大量死亡。很快研究将阻止艾滋病导致的死亡。在你的有生之年癌症能够被预防或治愈吗?应该而且能够,但前提是美国人要大声疾呼,要求国会尽自己的职责,通过支持国立卫生研究院以及控制癌症的努力来推动有前景的研究。癌症几乎侵袭了每个家庭,我们迫切需要更多防御措施。我们绝不能再静静地坐等了。是时候敲响警钟,拿起武器,宣布一场要求取得成果的战争行动了。美国在海湾战争上的花费是癌症研究年度预算拨款的30倍,维持太空计划的花费则是其5倍。如今,经严格科学评审批准的所有癌症研究拨款中有四分之三仍未发挥作用。这些情况意味着更多失去的机会、更多失去的时间、更多失去的生命。我们必须做得更好。癌症侵袭着我们社会的核心与结构。对于今年被诊断出患有癌症的130万美国人来说,给我们经济造成的损失将超过1000亿美元。因此,目前用于研究的24亿美元在医学和道德层面都远远不够。几位有远见的国会领导人明白增加资金的迫切需求,一直在努力确保为国立卫生研究院和癌症研究提供更多资源。不幸的是,他们的声音常常被有着不同议程的立法者的声音淹没。即便资金有限,美国过去25年的癌症研究也已取得成效。我们已经治愈了某些类型的癌症,尤其是那些侵袭年轻人的癌症。从1973年到1990年,19岁及以下人群的癌症死亡率下降了38%;20至40岁人群的下降了20%;45至54岁人群的下降了10%。在同一时期,政府在睾丸癌研究上投入了5600万美元。这项努力带来了9l%的治愈率,每年节省1.66亿美元,而且这一成果将永远持续下去。这笔财政投资在6个月内就得到了回报,患者的预期寿命增加了40年。这些例子以及其他事例都证明了支持癌症研究是有回报的这一原则。然而,对于乳腺癌、前列腺癌和肺癌等更常见的癌症形式,我们尚未赢得如此来之不易的胜利。无论是通过治愈还是预防,癌症都必须得到控制,而这只能通过研究来实现。1971年12月23日,理查德·尼克松总统签署了《国家癌症法案》,该法案旨在“……国会和总统的全面承诺……提供资金……以攻克癌症”。这份与美国的契约不知在何处迷失了。我们现在面临着更多损失。美国医学领域的新动荡威胁到癌症研究中的临床研究,这些研究旨在测试新疗法,并支持培训新的研究人员加入战斗。保险和管理式医疗政策的底线思维不再关注这些关键要素;它们表示这不再是它们的责任。这种财政支持的缺失,再加上政府对研究资金的不热情支持,恰恰发生在有大量新发现和新机会可用于攻克癌症的时候。是时候大幅加大我们的努力了,绝不能退缩。如果我们真的想抵御癌症的恐怖,我们需要以一场真正的战争行动来对抗它。如果我们能登上火星,我们就能向癌症宣战,但前提是美国人要比他们选举出来的政府领导人声音更大。他们现在需要听到我们的意见。