Suppr超能文献

《国家癌症法案》及其他相关法案的资金影响。

Funding impact of the National Cancer Act and beyond.

作者信息

Kalberer J T, Newell G R

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1979 Oct;39(10):4274-84.

PMID:383282
Abstract

During the seven years following passage of the National Cancer Act of 1971, the appropriation for the National Cancer Institute (NCI) was increased by nearly $700 million. A major effect of the Act has been increased funding for grants-in-aid, which rose from $93 million in fiscal year (FY) 1970 to over $416 million in FY 1978. Grants programs account for over 60% of the total N. CI extramural research budget and are divided into four broad categories; research; training (including fellowships); cancer control; and construction. For the first 4 years following passage of the Act, funding for all grants programs increased dramatically. However, growth began to slow in 1976, and the deceleration is continuing. Total NCI obligations for FY 1978 increased at a rate of 7% (as opposed to an increase of 20.3% in FY 1975), which merely managed to keep pace with the estimated Biomedical Inflation Factor of 6.8%. Traditional grants have more than doubled in average cost over the past 10 years, a growth attributable to inflation, more sophisticated and expensive equipment and supplies, and, in some cases, more ambitious projects. The principal types of research grants include: traditional, investigator-initiated research; program projects, a team approach directed toward a common goal; and "core" support used to fund administrative and shared equipment costs of cancer centers. In FY 1977, the actual number of traditional grants awarded declined for the first time in 7 years, while the number of applications for both new and renewal grants increased at an unprecedented rate. Coincidentally, the number of traditional grants awarded this fiscal year increased by 4%, enabling the figure to exactly match that in 1978. While support for traditional grants has remained in the forefront of NCI funding, money for program projects and core support has increased at a greater rate in recent years. However, unlike the years immediately following the Act, emphasis is now being placed on core support (which increased by 9.4% in FY 1978) and program project grants (up 5.1%), as opposed to the exploratory grants necessary to initiate cancer centers. Funds allocated for construction in the wake of the Act are now being reduced, as the pace of development of new centers begins to slow. Although the number of grant awards has decreased, young investigators (35 years old or younger) continued to receiving a significant share of NCI funds, and, in fact, are faring better than older investigators in terms of recommendation, previously referred to as "approval," and award rates. Awards to foreign scientists increased steadily after the Act, achieving their greatest dollar increase ever in FY 1977; in FY 1978, however, they declined by more than 6%. As part of the NCI reorganization plan instituted by NCI Director Arthur C...

摘要

在1971年《国家癌症法案》通过后的七年里,国家癌症研究所(NCI)的拨款增加了近7亿美元。该法案的一个主要影响是增加了对援助金的资助,援助金从1970财年的9300万美元增至1978财年的逾4.16亿美元。资助项目占NCI全部校外研究预算的60%以上,分为四大类:研究;培训(包括奖学金);癌症控制;以及建设。在该法案通过后的头四年里,所有资助项目的资金都大幅增加。然而,增长在1976年开始放缓,并且减速仍在持续。1978财年NCI的总支出以7%的速度增长(而1975财年为20.3%),仅勉强跟上6.8%的估计生物医学通胀率。在过去十年里,传统资助的平均成本增加了一倍多,这种增长归因于通货膨胀、更精密和昂贵的设备及用品,以及在某些情况下更宏大的项目。主要的研究资助类型包括:传统的、由研究者发起的研究;项目计划,一种针对共同目标的团队方法;以及用于资助癌症中心行政和共享设备成本的“核心”支持。1977财年,授予的传统资助的实际数量七年来首次下降,而新资助和续期资助的申请数量以前所未有的速度增加。巧合的是,本财年授予的传统资助数量增加了4%,使这一数字与1978年完全持平。虽然对传统资助的支持一直处于NCI资助的前沿,但近年来用于项目计划和核心支持的资金增长速度更快。然而,与该法案刚通过后的几年不同,现在重点放在了核心支持(1978财年增加了9.4%)和项目计划资助(增加了5.1%)上,而不是启动癌症中心所需的探索性资助。随着新中心的发展速度开始放缓,该法案通过后拨给建设的资金现在正在减少。尽管资助奖励的数量有所减少,但年轻研究者(35岁及以下)继续获得NCI资金的很大一部分,事实上,在推荐(以前称为“批准”)和奖励率方面,他们比年长的研究者情况更好。该法案通过后,授予外国科学家的奖励稳步增加,在1977财年实现了有史以来最大的美元增幅;然而,在1978财年,它们下降了6%以上。作为NCI主任亚瑟·C……制定的NCI重组计划的一部分

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验