Diabetes Care. 1999 Jul;22(7):1125-36. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.7.1125.
To determine in patients with type 2 diabetes the effects on quality of life (QOL) of therapies for improving blood glucose control and for improving blood pressure (BP) control, diabetic complications, and hypoglycemic episodes.
We performed two cross-sectional studies of patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials of 1) an intensive blood glucose control policy compared with a conventional blood glucose control policy, and 2) a tight BP control policy compared with a less tight BP control policy. Also undertaken was a longitudinal study of patients in a randomized controlled trial of an intensive blood glucose control policy compared with a conventional blood glucose control policy. Subjects' QOL was assessed before or at the time of randomization and from 6 months to 6 years after randomization. Two cross-sectional samples of type 2 diabetic patients were randomized to therapies for blood glucose control: 1) 2,431 patients, mean age 60, duration from randomization 8.0 years, completed a "specific" questionnaire covering four aspects of QOL, and 2) 3,104 patients, mean age 62, duration from randomization 11 years, completed a "generic" QOL measure. Of these samples, 628 and 747 patients, respectively, were also randomized to therapies for BP control. A sample of 122 non-diabetic control subjects, average age 62, were also given the specific questionnaire. A longitudinal sample of 374 type 2 diabetic patients randomized to either intensive or conventional blood glucose policies, mean age at randomization 52, were given the specific questionnaire. Sample-sizes at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years after randomization were 322, 307, 280, 253, 225, 163, and 184, respectively. The specific questionnaire assessed specific domains of QOL, including mood disturbance (Profile of Mood State), cognitive mistakes (Cognitive Failures Questionnaire), symptoms, and work satisfaction; the generic questionnaire (EQ5D) assessed general health. Both questionnaires were self-administered.
The cross-sectional studies showed that allocated therapies were neutral in effect, with neither improvement nor deterioration in QOL scores for mood, cognitive mistakes, symptoms, work satisfaction, or general health. The longitudinal study also showed no difference in QOL scores for the specific domains assessed, other than showing marginally more symptoms in patients allocated to conventional than to intensive policy. In the cross-sectional studies, patients who had had a macrovascular complication in the last year had worse general health, as measured by the generic questionnaire, than those without complications, with scale scores median 60 and 78 respectively (P = 0.0006) and tariff scores median 0.73 and 0.83 respectively (P = 0.0012); more problems with mobility, 64 and 36%, respectively (P < 0.0001); and more problems with usual activities, 48 and 28% respectively (P = 0.0023). As measured by the specific questionnaire, they also showed reduced vigor (P = 0.0077). Patients who had had a microvascular complication in the last year reported more tension (P = 0.0082) and total mood disturbance (P = 0.0054), as measured by the specific questionnaire, than patients without complications. Patients treated with insulin who had had two or more hypoglycemic episodes during the previous year reported more tension (P = 0.0023), more overall mood disturbance (P = 0.0009), and less work satisfaction (P = 0.0042), as measured by the specific questionnaire, than those with no hypoglycemic attacks, after adjusting for age, duration from randomization, systolic BP, HbA1c, and sex in a multivariate polychotomous regression.
In patients with type 2 diabetes, complications of the disease affected QOL, whereas therapeutic policies shown to reduce the risk of complications had no effect on QOL. It cannot be discerned whether frequent hypoglycemic episodes affect QOL, or whether patients with certain p
确定2型糖尿病患者中,改善血糖控制、改善血压控制、糖尿病并发症及低血糖发作的治疗方法对生活质量(QOL)的影响。
我们对参加随机对照试验的患者进行了两项横断面研究,试验内容分别为:1)强化血糖控制策略与传统血糖控制策略的对比;2)严格血压控制策略与较宽松血压控制策略的对比。同时,我们还对参加强化血糖控制策略与传统血糖控制策略随机对照试验的患者进行了纵向研究。在随机分组前或随机分组时以及随机分组后6个月至6年对受试者的生活质量进行评估。两组2型糖尿病患者横断面样本被随机分配接受血糖控制治疗:1)2431例患者,平均年龄60岁,随机分组后病程8.0年,完成一份涵盖生活质量四个方面的“特定”问卷;2)3104例患者,平均年龄62岁,随机分组后病程11年,完成一项“通用”生活质量测量。在这些样本中,分别有628例和747例患者也被随机分配接受血压控制治疗。122例非糖尿病对照受试者样本,平均年龄62岁,也接受了特定问卷的调查。374例2型糖尿病患者的纵向样本被随机分配接受强化或传统血糖控制策略,随机分组时平均年龄52岁,接受特定问卷的调查。随机分组后6个月以及1、2、3、4、5和6年时的样本量分别为322例、307例、280例、253例、225例、163例和184例。特定问卷评估生活质量的特定领域,包括情绪障碍(情绪状态量表)、认知失误(认知失误问卷)、症状和工作满意度;通用问卷(EQ5D)评估总体健康状况。两份问卷均为自填式。
横断面研究表明,分配的治疗方法效果呈中性,情绪、认知失误、症状、工作满意度或总体健康状况的生活质量评分既无改善也无恶化。纵向研究还表明,除了接受传统治疗策略的患者比接受强化治疗策略的患者出现的症状略多外,所评估的特定领域的生活质量评分没有差异。在横断面研究中,根据通用问卷测量,去年发生大血管并发症的患者总体健康状况比无并发症的患者更差,量表评分中位数分别为60和78(P = 0.0006),关税评分中位数分别为0.73和0.83(P = 0.0012);行动不便问题更多,分别为64%和36%(P < 0.0001);日常活动问题更多,分别为48%和28%(P = 0.0023)。根据特定问卷测量,他们的活力也有所下降(P = 0.0077)。根据特定问卷测量,去年发生微血管并发症的患者比无并发症的患者报告有更多的紧张情绪(P = 0.0082)和总体情绪障碍(P = 0.0054)。在多变量多分类回归中,校正年龄、随机分组后病程、收缩压、糖化血红蛋白和性别后,前一年发生两次或更多次低血糖发作的接受胰岛素治疗的患者,与无低血糖发作的患者相比,并根据特定问卷测量,报告有更多的紧张情绪(P = 0.0023)、更多的总体情绪障碍(P = 0.0009)和更低的工作满意度(P = 0.0042)。
在2型糖尿病患者中,疾病并发症影响生活质量,而显示可降低并发症风险的治疗策略对生活质量没有影响。无法确定频繁低血糖发作是否会影响生活质量,或者某些患者是否……