Diabetes. 1995 Nov;44(11):1249-58.
The objective of the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study is to determine whether improved blood glucose control in type II diabetes will prevent the complications of diabetes and whether any specific therapy is advantageous or disadvantageous. The study will report in 1998, when the median duration from randomization will be 11 years. This report is on the efficacy of therapy over 6 years of follow-up and the overall incidence of diabetic complications. Subjects comprised 4,209 newly diagnosed type II diabetic patients who after 3 months' diet were asymptomatic and had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 6.0-15.0 mmol/l. The study consists of a randomized controlled trial with two main comparisons: 1) 3,867 patients with 1,138 allocated to conventional therapy, primarily with diet, and 2,729 allocated to intensive therapy with additional sulfonylurea or insulin, which increase insulin supply, aiming for FPG < 6 mmol/l; and 2) 753 obese patients with 411 allocated to conventional therapy and 342 allocated to intensive therapy with metformin, which enhances insulin sensitivity. In the first comparison, in 2,287 subjects studied for 6 years, intensive therapy with sulfonylurea and insulin similarly improved glucose control compared with conventional therapy, with median FPG at 1 year of 6.8 and 8.2 mmol/l, respectively (P < 0.0001). and median HbA1c of 6.1 and 6.8%, respectively (P < 0.0001). During the next 5 years, the FPG increased progressively on all therapies (P < 0.0001) with medians at 6 years in the conventional and intensive groups, FPG 9.5 and 7.8 mmol/l, and HbA1c 8.0 and 7.1%, respectively. The glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of beta-cell function. In the second comparison, in 548 obese subjects studied for 6 years, metformin improved glucose control similarly to intensive therapy with sulfonylurea or insulin. Metformin did not increase body weight or increase the incidence of hypoglycemia to the same extent as therapy with sulfonylurea or insulin. A high incidence of clinical complications occurred by 6-year follow-up. Of all subjects, 18.0% had suffered one or more diabetes-related clinical endpoints, with 12.1% having a macrovascular and 5.7% a microvascular endpoint. Sulfonylurea, metformin, and insulin therapies were similarly effective in improving glucose control compared with a policy of diet therapy. The study is examining whether the continued improved glucose control, obtained by intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy (median over 6 years HbA1c 6.6% compared with 7.4%), will be clinically advantageous in maintaining health.
英国前瞻性糖尿病研究的目的是确定改善II型糖尿病患者的血糖控制是否能预防糖尿病并发症,以及任何特定疗法的利弊。该研究将于1998年报告结果,届时从随机分组开始计算的中位时间将为11年。本报告涉及6年随访期内的治疗效果及糖尿病并发症的总体发生率。研究对象包括4209名新诊断的II型糖尿病患者,他们在经过3个月的饮食控制后无症状,空腹血糖(FPG)为6.0 - 15.0 mmol/L。该研究包括一项随机对照试验,有两个主要比较组:1)3867例患者,其中1138例分配至传统治疗组,主要采用饮食治疗,2729例分配至强化治疗组,使用额外的磺脲类药物或胰岛素以增加胰岛素供应,目标是FPG < 6 mmol/L;2)753例肥胖患者,其中411例分配至传统治疗组,342例分配至使用二甲双胍的强化治疗组,二甲双胍可增强胰岛素敏感性。在第一个比较组中,对2287名研究6年的受试者而言,与传统治疗相比,磺脲类药物和胰岛素强化治疗同样改善了血糖控制,1年时的中位FPG分别为6.8和8.2 mmol/L(P < 0.0001),中位糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分别为6.1%和6.8%(P < 0.0001)。在接下来的5年中,所有治疗方式下FPG均逐渐升高(P < 0.0001),传统治疗组和强化治疗组6年时的中位FPG分别为9.5和7.8 mmol/L,HbA1c分别为8.0%和7.1%。血糖恶化与β细胞功能的逐渐丧失有关。在第二个比较组中,对548名研究6年的肥胖受试者而言,二甲双胍改善血糖控制的效果与磺脲类药物或胰岛素强化治疗相似。二甲双胍不会增加体重,也不会像磺脲类药物或胰岛素治疗那样增加低血糖的发生率。到6年随访时临床并发症发生率较高。在所有受试者中,18.0%发生了一个或多个与糖尿病相关的临床终点事件,其中12.1%发生大血管终点事件,5.7%发生微血管终点事件。与饮食治疗策略相比,磺脲类药物、二甲双胍和胰岛素治疗在改善血糖控制方面同样有效。该研究正在考察与传统治疗相比(6年中位HbA1c分别为6.6%和7.4%),强化治疗持续改善的血糖控制在维持健康方面是否具有临床优势。