Gordon T A, Bowman H M, Bass E B, Lillemoe K D, Yeo C J, Heitmiller R F, Choti M A, Burleyson G P, Hsieh G, Cameron J L
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):46-56. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00072-1.
Commonly performed elective gastrointestinal surgical procedures are carried out with low morbidity and mortality in hospitals throughout the United States. Complex operative procedures on the alimentary tract are performed with a relatively low frequency and are associated with higher mortality. Volume and experience of the surgical provider team have been correlated with better clinical and economic outcomes for one complex gastrointestinal surgical procedure, pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study evaluated whether provider volume and experience were important factors influencing clinical and economic outcomes for a variety of complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures in one state.
Complex high-risk gastrointestinal surgical procedures were defined as those with statewide in-hospital mortality of > or = 5%, frequency of greater than 200 per year in the state, and requiring special surgical skill and expertise. Six procedures met these criteria. Using publicly available discharge data, all patients discharged from Maryland hospitals from July 1989 to June 1997 with a primary procedure code for one of the six study procedures were selected. Hospitals were classified into one of six groups based on the average number of study procedures per year: 10 or less; 11 to 20; 21 to 50; 51 to 100; 101 to 200; and 201 or more procedures per year. A hospital was included if at least one procedure was performed there during the study period. No providers fell within the 51 to 100, and 101 to 200 groups, so all analyses were performed for the remaining four volume groups that were classified, respectively, as minimal (10 or fewer procedures), low (11 to 20 procedures), medium (21 to 50 procedures), and high-volume groups (201 or more procedures). Poisson regression was used to assess the relationship between in-hospital mortality and hospital volume after case-mix adjustment. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess differences in average length-of-stay and average total hospital charges among hospital volume groups. We further analyzed mortality, length-of-stay, and charges at the procedural level to understand these subgroups of complex gastrointestinal patients. We also examined the relationship between provider volume and outcomes for malignant versus benign diagnosis groups.
Complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures were performed on 4,561 patients in Maryland from July 1989 through June 1997. The study population averaged 61.6 years of age, was 55% male, 71% Caucasian, and had predominantly Medicare as a payment source. After case-mix adjustment, patients who underwent complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures at the medium-, low-, and minimal-volume provider groups had a 2.1, 3.3, and 3.2 times greater risk of in-hospital death, respectively, than patients at the high-volume provider (p < 0.001 for all comparisons); longer lengths-of-stay, 16.1, 15.7, and 15.5 days at the low-, medium-, and minimal-volume groups, respectively, versus 14.0 days for the high-volume provider (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similarly, adjusted charges at the high-volume provider were, on average, 14% less than those of the low-volume group, which had the next lowest charges. Although mortality rates differed by procedure type, for each procedure, mortality increased as provider volume decreased, following the pattern found in the aggregate analysis. After case-mix adjustment, the risk of in-hospital death for patients with malignant diagnoses was significantly higher for the medium-, low-, and minimal-volume groups compared with patients at the high-volume provider, relative risk of 3.1, 4.0, and 4.2, respectively, (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).
This study demonstrates that increased hospital experience is associated with a marked decrease in hospital mortality. The decreased mortality at the high-volume provider was also associated with shorter lengths-of-stay and lower hospital char
在美国各地的医院中,常见的选择性胃肠道外科手术的发病率和死亡率较低。消化道复杂手术的实施频率相对较低,且死亡率较高。手术提供者团队的手术量和经验与一种复杂的胃肠道手术——胰十二指肠切除术更好的临床和经济结果相关。本研究评估了手术提供者的手术量和经验是否是影响一个州各种复杂胃肠道手术临床和经济结果的重要因素。
复杂的高风险胃肠道外科手术被定义为那些全州住院死亡率≥5%、该州每年手术例数超过200例且需要特殊手术技能和专业知识的手术。有六种手术符合这些标准。利用公开的出院数据,选取了1989年7月至1997年6月从马里兰州医院出院且主要手术编码为六种研究手术之一的所有患者。根据每年研究手术的平均例数,医院被分为六组之一:每年10例或更少;11至20例;21至50例;51至100例;101至200例;以及每年201例或更多。如果在研究期间该医院至少进行了一例手术,则将其纳入。没有提供者属于51至100例以及101至200例这两组,因此所有分析是针对其余四个手术量组进行的,分别被分类为低手术量组(10例或更少手术)、低手术量组(11至20例手术)、中等手术量组(21至50例手术)和高手术量组(201例或更多手术)。采用泊松回归在病例组合调整后评估住院死亡率与医院手术量之间的关系。使用多元线性回归模型评估各医院手术量组之间平均住院时间和平均总住院费用的差异。我们进一步在手术层面分析死亡率、住院时间和费用,以了解这些复杂胃肠道患者的亚组情况。我们还研究了手术提供者手术量与恶性诊断组和良性诊断组结果之间的关系。
1989年7月至1997年6月期间,马里兰州有4561例患者接受了复杂的胃肠道外科手术。研究人群的平均年龄为61.6岁,男性占55%,白种人占71%,主要支付来源为医疗保险。病例组合调整后,中等手术量、低手术量和低手术量提供者组接受复杂胃肠道手术的患者住院死亡风险分别比高手术量提供者组的患者高2.1倍、3.3倍和3.2倍(所有比较p<0.001);住院时间更长,低手术量、中等手术量和低手术量组分别为16.1天、15.7天和15.5天,而高手术量提供者组为14.0天(所有比较p<0.001)。同样,高手术量提供者组的调整后费用平均比费用次低的低手术量组低14%。尽管不同手术类型的死亡率有所不同,但对于每种手术,随着提供者手术量的减少,死亡率增加,这与总体分析中发现的模式一致。病例组合调整后,中等手术量、低手术量和低手术量组恶性诊断患者的住院死亡风险显著高于高手术量提供者组的患者,相对风险分别为3.1、4.0和4.2(所有比较p<0.001)。
本研究表明,医院经验的增加与医院死亡率的显著降低相关。高手术量提供者组死亡率的降低还与住院时间缩短和医院费用降低相关。