Wain R A, Veith F J, Berkowitz B A, Legatt A D, Schwartz M, Lipsitz E C, Haut S R, Bello J A
Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):93-100; discussion 100-1. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00070-8.
Selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy is widely performed, but the optimal approach for predicting when a shunt is unnecessary remains uncertain. We evaluated the ability of preoperative cerebral angiography to predict when carotid endarterectomy could be safely performed without a shunt.
Eighty-seven patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy between August 1991 and December 1997 had preoperative cerebral angiograms. The angiograms were evaluated for the presence of collateral flow from the contralateral carotid through the anterior communicating artery and from the posterior circulation through the posterior communicating artery. Patients then underwent endarterectomy and were selectively shunted based on somatosensory evoked potential changes. Internal carotid artery stump pressure was routinely measured in all patients.
Nine patients (10%) had a shunt placed based on somatosensory evoked potential changes and none of the 87 patients had a perioperative (30 days) stroke. Angiography revealed that 36 patients (41%) had no cross-filling from the contralateral carotid through the anterior communicating artery. Nine of these patients (25%) required a shunt; none of the 51 patients with adequate cross-filling (p < 0.001) did. Furthermore, 94% of the patients without cross-filling but with a patent ipsilateral posterior communicating artery did not require a shunt using somatosensory evoked potential changes as the standard for shunt insertion. Stump pressure measurements (> or = 25 mmHg) or (> or = 50 mmHg) did not reliably exclude the need for a shunt. Only 2 of 15 patients with contralateral carotid occlusion and 1 of 16 patients with a prior ipsilateral stroke required shunts.
In the presence of cross-filling from the contralateral carotid artery, shunt insertion was uniformly unnecessary. In addition, routine shunting of patients with previous ipsilateral strokes or contralateral carotid occlusion was not always necessary. Stump pressures were less sensitive than angiographic criteria in determining when a shunt was unnecessary. Evaluation of cross-filling from the contralateral carotid artery on preoperative angiography can predict with certainty which patients will not require a shunt.
颈动脉内膜切除术期间的选择性分流术应用广泛,但预测何时无需分流的最佳方法仍不明确。我们评估了术前脑血管造影预测何时颈动脉内膜切除术可不使用分流器安全进行的能力。
1991年8月至1997年12月期间接受颈动脉内膜切除术的87例患者术前行脑血管造影。评估造影显示的对侧颈动脉经前交通动脉的侧支血流以及后循环经后交通动脉的侧支血流情况。然后患者接受内膜切除术,并根据体感诱发电位变化进行选择性分流。所有患者均常规测量颈内动脉残端压力。
9例(10%)患者基于体感诱发电位变化进行了分流,87例患者中无一例发生围手术期(30天内)卒中。血管造影显示,36例(41%)患者对侧颈动脉经前交通动脉无交叉充盈。其中9例(25%)患者需要分流;51例交叉充盈充分的患者(p<0.001)均无需分流。此外,以体感诱发电位变化作为分流置入标准时,94%对侧无交叉充盈但同侧后交通动脉通畅的患者无需分流。残端压力测量值(≥25 mmHg)或(≥50 mmHg)并不能可靠地排除分流的必要性。15例对侧颈动脉闭塞患者中仅2例需要分流,16例既往有同侧卒中患者中仅1例需要分流。
当存在对侧颈动脉交叉充盈时,一致无需置入分流器。此外,既往有同侧卒中或对侧颈动脉闭塞的患者常规进行分流并不总是必要的。在确定何时无需分流时,残端压力比血管造影标准敏感性低。术前血管造影评估对侧颈动脉交叉充盈情况可确切预测哪些患者无需分流。