Sieper J, Fendler C, Laitko S, Sörensen H, Gripenberg-Lerche C, Hiepe F, Alten R, Keitel W, Groh A, Uksila J, Eggens U, Granfors K, Braun J
Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University, and Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany.
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jul;42(7):1386-96. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1386::AID-ANR12>3.0.CO;2-E.
To investigate the effect of long-term antibiotic treatment in patients with reactive arthritis (ReA) and undifferentiated oligoarthritis.
One hundred twenty-six patients were treated with ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice a day) or placebo for 3 months, in a double-blind, randomized study. Of these patients, 104 (48 treated with ciprofloxacin and 56 treated with placebo) were valid for clinical evaluation: 55 were diagnosed as having ReA with a preceding symptomatic urogenic or enteric infection and 49 as having undifferentiated oligoarthritis. These 2 groups were randomized separately. The triggering bacterium was sought by serology and/or culture. The percentage of patients in remission after 3 months of treatment was chosen as the primary efficacy parameter.
A triggering bacterium could be identified in 52 patients (50%): Chlamydia trachomatis in 13, Yersinia in 14, and Salmonella in 25. No patient was positive for Campylobacter jejuni or for Shigella. No difference in outcome was found between treatment with ciprofloxacin or placebo in the whole group or in subgroups of patients with ReA or undifferentiated oligoarthritis. No difference was seen in patients with a disease duration <3 months. Ciprofloxacin was not effective in Yersinia- or Salmonella-induced arthritis but seemed to be better than placebo in Chlamydia-induced arthritis. This difference was not significant, however, which might be due to the small sample size.
Long-term treatment of ReA with ciprofloxacin is not effective; however, it might be useful in the subgroup of patients who have Chlamydia-induced arthritis. This has to be proven in a bigger study focusing on patients with Chlamydia-induced arthritis.
探讨长期抗生素治疗对反应性关节炎(ReA)和未分化寡关节炎患者的疗效。
在一项双盲、随机研究中,126例患者接受环丙沙星(500毫克,每日两次)或安慰剂治疗3个月。其中104例患者(48例接受环丙沙星治疗,56例接受安慰剂治疗)可进行临床评估:55例被诊断为患有ReA且之前有症状性泌尿生殖道或肠道感染,49例被诊断为患有未分化寡关节炎。这两组患者分别进行随机分组。通过血清学和/或培养寻找触发细菌。选择治疗3个月后缓解的患者百分比作为主要疗效参数。
52例患者(50%)可鉴定出触发细菌:13例为沙眼衣原体,14例为耶尔森菌,25例为沙门菌。空肠弯曲菌或志贺菌检测均为阴性。环丙沙星治疗组与安慰剂治疗组在整个研究组、ReA患者亚组或未分化寡关节炎患者亚组中的治疗结果无差异。病程<3个月的患者中也未观察到差异。环丙沙星对耶尔森菌或沙门菌诱导的关节炎无效,但在沙眼衣原体诱导的关节炎中似乎比安慰剂更有效。然而,这种差异并不显著,可能是由于样本量较小。
环丙沙星长期治疗ReA无效;然而,它可能对沙眼衣原体诱导的关节炎患者亚组有用。这一点必须在一项针对沙眼衣原体诱导的关节炎患者的更大规模研究中得到证实。