Suppr超能文献

左氧氟沙星对社区获得性下呼吸道感染成年患者分离菌株的体外活性比较

Comparative in-vitro activity of levofloxacin against isolates of bacteria from adult patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Casellas J M, Gilardoni M, Tome G, Goldberg M, Ivanovic S, Orduna M, Dolmann A, Ascoli M, Ariza H, Montero J M

机构信息

Centro de Estudios en Antimicrobianos, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Jun;43 Suppl C:37-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_3.37.

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the activity of levofloxacin in comparison with a range of antibacterial agents against recent isolates obtained consecutively from patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) during the period 1995 to 1996. Susceptibility testing was carried out by either microdilution or the Etest, and interpreted according to NCCLS breakpoints. The activity of levofloxacin was compared with that of amoxycillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime, cefixime, erythromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Clinically significant numbers of bacteria were recovered from 31 CAP and 94 AECB specimens. The predominant bacterial species in the CAP specimens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (21 isolates) and Haemophilus influenzae (four isolates). The AECB isolates mainly consisted of S. pneumoniae (38%), Moraxella catarrhalis (26%), H. influenzae (19%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10%). The overall percentage susceptible of the isolates for each antibiotic was: amoxycillin, 64%; amoxycillin-clavulanate, 89%; cefuroxime, 87%; cefixime, 78%; erythromycin, 85%; roxithromycin, 87%; clarithromycin, 87%; azithromycin, 85%; ofloxacin, 95%; ciprofloxacin, 95%; and levofloxacin, 97%. The activities of levofloxacin and the other agents were also compared against 40 S. pneumoniae isolates, of which 20 were penicillin-non-susceptible, recovered from CAP and AECB specimens during the period 1994 to 1996. These strains were all susceptible to levofloxacin, but only 50% were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and 80% to ofloxacin. Twenty M. catarrhalis, 20 H. influenzae and 20 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates were also all susceptible to levofloxacin. Furthermore, 20 community-acquired P. aeruginosa isolates showed similar percentage susceptible rates to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. These in-vitro results suggest that levofloxacin may be useful in the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

摘要

本研究旨在评估左氧氟沙星与一系列抗菌药物相比,对1995年至1996年期间连续从社区获得性肺炎(CAP)或慢性支气管炎急性加重(AECB)患者分离出的近期菌株的抗菌活性。药敏试验采用微量稀释法或Etest法进行,并根据美国国家临床实验室标准化委员会(NCCLS)的断点进行解释。将左氧氟沙星的活性与阿莫西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢呋辛、头孢克肟、红霉素、罗红霉素、克拉霉素、阿奇霉素、氧氟沙星和环丙沙星进行比较。从31份CAP标本和94份AECB标本中分离出了具有临床意义数量的细菌。CAP标本中的主要细菌种类为肺炎链球菌(21株)和流感嗜血杆菌(4株)。AECB分离株主要包括肺炎链球菌(38%)、卡他莫拉菌(26%)、流感嗜血杆菌(19%)和铜绿假单胞菌(10%)。每种抗生素分离株的总体敏感百分比为:阿莫西林64%;阿莫西林-克拉维酸89%;头孢呋辛87%;头孢克肟78%;红霉素85%;罗红霉素87%;克拉霉素87%;阿奇霉素85%;氧氟沙星95%;环丙沙星95%;左氧氟沙星97%。还比较了左氧氟沙星和其他药物对1994年至1996年期间从CAP和AECB标本中分离出的40株肺炎链球菌的活性,其中20株对青霉素不敏感。这些菌株对左氧氟沙星均敏感,但对环丙沙星的敏感率仅为50%,对氧氟沙星的敏感率为80%。20株卡他莫拉菌、20株流感嗜血杆菌和20株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对左氧氟沙星也均敏感。此外,20株社区获得性铜绿假单胞菌分离株对左氧氟沙星和环丙沙星的敏感率相似。这些体外研究结果表明,左氧氟沙星可能对社区获得性下呼吸道感染的治疗有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验