de Dios del Valle R, Hernández Sánchez A, Franco Vidal A, Palancar de la Torre J L
Centro de Salud Dr. Cirajas, Area 4, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública del Hospital La Paz, Madrid.
Aten Primaria. 2001 Apr 15;27(6):412-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78823-3.
To find scientific evidence to support the indication for treating outbreaks in COPD patients on an out-patient basis with levofloxacine, as against conventional treatments.
Standardised review, following the criteria of medicine based on the evidence. A bibliographic search of the MEDLINE data base from 1966 to June 2000 was the basis for an analysis of the evidence found.
Non-hospital treatment.
COPD patients suffering a light outbreak of probable bacterial origin, according to the Anthonisen criteria.
The intervention analysed was treatment with 500 mg/day of levofloxacine taken orally. An attempt was made to compare this with conventional treatments such as amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and acetyl cefuroxime. The indicators of results analysed were reduction in mortality or in the number of hospital admissions.
No clinical trial was found that compared levofloxacine and amoxycillin-clavulanic acid. Two clinical trials were found that compared levofloxacine and acetyl cefuroxime. These found no significant differences between the group treated with levofloxacine and the group treated with cefuroxime.
No scientific evidence demonstrating advantages of levofloxacine treatment over amoxycillin-clavulanic acid was found, or over acetyl cefuroxime as empirical PC first-choice treatment for patients with outbreaks of COPD.
寻找科学证据,以支持慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者门诊爆发性感染时使用左氧氟沙星治疗相对于传统治疗的适应证。
依据循证医学标准进行的标准化综述。对1966年至2000年6月MEDLINE数据库进行文献检索,以此为基础分析所发现的证据。
非住院治疗。
根据安东尼森标准,患有可能源于细菌的轻度爆发性感染的COPD患者。
所分析的干预措施为口服500毫克/天的左氧氟沙星治疗。试图将其与阿莫西林-克拉维酸和头孢呋辛酯等传统治疗方法进行比较。所分析的结果指标为死亡率降低或住院人数减少。
未发现比较左氧氟沙星和阿莫西林-克拉维酸的临床试验。发现两项比较左氧氟沙星和头孢呋辛酯的临床试验。这些试验发现,左氧氟沙星治疗组和头孢呋辛酯治疗组之间无显著差异。
未发现科学证据表明左氧氟沙星治疗相对于阿莫西林-克拉维酸或作为COPD爆发患者经验性门诊首选用药的头孢呋辛酯具有优势。