Ho S K, Chan T M, Cheng I K, Lai K N
Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Aug;37(8):2461-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.8.2461-2465.1999.
The optimal hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitative assay for clinical use remains to be determined. We examined the sensitivity, linearity, and variability of a novel second-generation antibody capture solution hybridization assay, the Digene Hybrid Capture II assay (HCII), and compared it with another widely used solution hybridization assay, the branched-DNA (bDNA) assay (Quantiplex; Chiron Corp.). Our results showed similar and satisfactory assay linearity values, as well as interassay and intra-assay variability values, for both HCII and bDNA assays across different ranges of HBV DNA. Ninety-one percent of 102 serum samples from hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients showed concordant results with the two assays. The HCII assay was more sensitive than the bDNA assay by 1 dilution, with the lowest reading being 0.9 pg/ml (3.8 pg/ml by bDNA assay). The HBV DNA seropositivity rates for the 102 samples were 58, 67, and 97% by bDNA, HCII, and nested PCR, respectively. While the relationship between results obtained with the bDNA assay and those with the HCII assay was nonlinear, with the bDNA assay yielding values 2.83 +/- 0.92-fold higher than those of the HCII assay, especially at high HBV DNA levels, a linear relationship was observed between the two sets of data after logarithmic conversion. The formula for interassay conversion of results was derived as follows: HBV DNA by HCII (picograms per milliliter) = 3.19 x HBV DNA by bDNA (megaequivalents per milliliter). The HCII assay was technically less complex and required a shorter assay time (4 h) than the bDNA assay (24 h). We conclude that the HCII assay compares favorably with the bDNA assay and offers the additional advantages of increased sensitivity and shorter assay time. The increased sensitivity should be particularly useful in monitoring the efficacy of antiviral therapies and detecting the emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants.
临床使用的最佳乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)DNA定量检测方法仍有待确定。我们检测了一种新型第二代抗体捕获溶液杂交检测法——Digene Hybrid Capture II检测法(HCII)的灵敏度、线性及变异性,并将其与另一种广泛使用的溶液杂交检测法——分支DNA(bDNA)检测法(Quantiplex;Chiron公司)进行比较。我们的结果显示,对于HCII和bDNA检测法,在不同HBV DNA范围内,检测线性值以及批间和批内变异性值均相似且令人满意。102份来自乙肝表面抗原阳性患者的血清样本中,91%的样本在两种检测法中结果一致。HCII检测法比bDNA检测法灵敏1个稀释度,最低读数为0.9 pg/ml(bDNA检测法为3.8 pg/ml)。对于这102份样本,bDNA、HCII和巢式PCR检测的HBV DNA血清阳性率分别为58%、67%和97%。虽然bDNA检测法与HCII检测法的结果之间呈非线性关系,bDNA检测法得出的值比HCII检测法高2.83±0.92倍,尤其是在高HBV DNA水平时,但两组数据经对数转换后呈线性关系。检测结果批间转换公式推导如下:HCII法检测的HBV DNA(皮克/毫升)=3.19×[bDNA法检测的HBV DNA(百万当量/毫升)]^(0.866)。与bDNA检测法(24小时)相比,HCII检测法技术上没那么复杂,检测时间更短(4小时)。我们得出结论,HCII检测法与bDNA检测法相比具有优势,具有更高的灵敏度和更短的检测时间等额外优点。更高的灵敏度在监测抗病毒治疗效果和检测耐药HBV突变体的出现方面应特别有用。