Yuan He-Jun, Yuen Man-Fung, Wong Danny Ka-Ho, Sum Simon Siu-Man, Lai Ching-Lung
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3513-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3513-3517.2004.
The measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for the assessment of liver disease and treatment efficacy. Most commercially available assays for the determination of HBV DNA levels have limited linear ranges. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II (Digene HC II assay) and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor test (COBAS-AM assay), with special emphasis on anti-HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with low HBV DNA levels. A total of 425 Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B were recruited. A total of 107 patients were HBeAg positive, and 318 patients were HBeAg negative. The Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay had similar intra-assay and interassay variabilities. A total of 264 patients (62.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay, and 47 patients (11.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the COBAS-AM assay (P < 0.001). For the 161 patients with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay, the HBV DNA levels obtained by the Digene HC II assay and by the COBAS-AM assay showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.95; P < 0.001). The linear ranges of the Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay marginally overlapped. Before HBV DNA levels could be determined by the COBAS-AM assay, predilution had to be performed for 158 of 161 patients (98.1%) with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay and for 10 of 264 patients (3.8%) with HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay. The cost for assaying each serum sample by using different strategies was calculated. The COBAS-AM assay was more sensitive than the Digene HC II assay and more suitable for monitoring low levels of HBV viremia.
乙肝病毒(HBV)DNA的检测对于评估肝脏疾病及治疗效果至关重要。多数市售的用于测定HBV DNA水平的检测方法线性范围有限。本研究旨在评估Digene Hybrid Capture II检测法(Digene HC II检测法)和COBAS AMPLICOR监测检测法(COBAS - AM检测法)的临床性能,特别关注乙肝e抗原(HBeAg)阳性且HBV DNA水平较低的患者。共招募了425例中国慢性乙型肝炎患者。其中107例患者HBeAg阳性,318例患者HBeAg阴性。Digene HC II检测法和COBAS - AM检测法的批内和批间变异相似。共有264例患者(62.1%)的HBV DNA水平用Digene HC II检测法检测不到,47例患者(11.1%)的HBV DNA水平用COBAS - AM检测法检测不到(P < 0.001)。对于161例能用Digene HC II检测法检测到HBV DNA水平的患者,Digene HC II检测法和COBAS - AM检测法测得的HBV DNA水平显示出极好的相关性(r = 0.95;P < 0.001)。Digene HC II检测法和COBAS - AM检测法的线性范围略有重叠。在能用COBAS - AM检测法测定HBV DNA水平之前,对于161例能用Digene HC II检测法检测到HBV DNA水平的患者中的158例(98.1%)以及264例用Digene HC II检测法检测不到HBV DNA水平的患者中的10例(3.8%)必须进行预稀释。计算了使用不同策略检测每个血清样本的成本。COBAS - AM检测法比Digene HC II检测法更灵敏,更适合监测低水平的HBV病毒血症。