Monga U, Kerrigan A J, Thornby J, Monga T N
Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston VA Medical Center, TX 77030, USA.
Radiat Oncol Investig. 1999;7(3):178-85. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:3<178::AID-ROI7>3.0.CO;2-0.
The objectives were to (1) prospectively evaluate fatigue utilizing validated instruments in patients with localized prostate cancer, and (2) examine the relationships between fatigue, depression, quality of life, and sleep disturbance. The instruments used included: Piper Fatigue Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Prostate Scale. Data on cancer stage, prostate specific antigen levels, hematocrit, patient's body weight and radiation dosage were recorded. Patients were evaluated preradiotherapy, middle of radiotherapy, completion of radiotherapy, and at 4-5 weeks follow-up. Thirty-six veterans with localized prostate cancer were studied. Mean age was 66.9 years (range 55-79). Duration of treatment was 7-8 weeks. Univariate procedure and Wilcoxon Signed Rank-test were used to examine changes in pretreatment scores for each of the three subsequent study periods. To adjust for multiple comparisons Bonferroni test was used. Spearman Correlations were calculated among parameters. No significant changes were noted in mean scores of hematocrit and body weight during the study period. On the Piper Fatigue Scale, adjusted for multiple comparisons, the median scores were significantly higher at completion of radiotherapy as compared with preradiotherapy values. Three patients (8%) were experienced fatigue according to Piper Fatigue Scale before treatment as compared to nine patients (25%) at completion of radiotherapy. On Prostate Cancer Specific and Physical Well Being subscales of the Functional Assessment for Prostate Cancer Therapy, the scores were significantly lower at middle and completion of radiotherapy than at pretreatment. At preradiotherapy, middle of radiotherapy, completion of radiotherapy and follow-up evaluation, patients scoring higher on the Piper Fatigue Scale were more likely to report a poorer quality of Physical Well Being on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Prostates. No significant changes were noted in the Beck Depression Inventory and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores during treatment. Eight patients scored 10 or more on the Beck Depression Inventory before starting radiotherapy, suggesting depressive symptomatology. Of these, only seven patients scored 10 or more at completion of treatment. The incidence of fatigue is lower in our study than in previously published data. A relationship exists between fatigue scores and physical well being subscale scores. Higher scores on the Piper Fatigue Scale at the completion of radiotherapy, as well as no changes on depression and sleepiness scales, suggest that fatigue may not be the result of depression or sleep disturbance. Based upon our previous work, we propose that the physical expression of fatigue may be secondary to a decline in neuromuscular efficiency and enhanced muscle fatigue.
(1)使用经过验证的工具对局限性前列腺癌患者的疲劳情况进行前瞻性评估;(2)研究疲劳、抑郁、生活质量和睡眠障碍之间的关系。所使用的工具包括:派珀疲劳量表、贝克抑郁量表、爱泼华嗜睡量表以及前列腺癌治疗功能评估量表。记录癌症分期、前列腺特异性抗原水平、血细胞比容、患者体重和放射剂量的数据。在放疗前、放疗中期、放疗结束时以及4 - 5周随访时对患者进行评估。对36名局限性前列腺癌退伍军人进行了研究。平均年龄为66.9岁(范围55 - 79岁)。治疗持续时间为7 - 8周。采用单因素分析和威尔科克森符号秩检验来检查随后三个研究阶段中每个阶段治疗前分数的变化。为校正多重比较,使用了邦费罗尼检验。计算各参数之间的斯皮尔曼相关性。在研究期间,血细胞比容和体重的平均分数未发现显著变化。在派珀疲劳量表上,经多重比较校正后,放疗结束时的中位数分数显著高于放疗前的值。治疗前,根据派珀疲劳量表,有3名患者(8%)经历疲劳,而放疗结束时为9名患者(25%)。在前列腺癌治疗功能评估的前列腺癌特异性和身体幸福感子量表上,放疗中期和结束时的分数显著低于治疗前。在放疗前、放疗中期、放疗结束时和随访评估中,在派珀疲劳量表上得分较高的患者在前列腺癌治疗功能评估中报告身体幸福感较差的可能性更大。治疗期间,贝克抑郁量表和爱泼华嗜睡量表的分数未发现显著变化。8名患者在开始放疗前贝克抑郁量表得分达到或超过10分,提示有抑郁症状。其中,只有7名患者在治疗结束时得分达到或超过10分。我们研究中疲劳的发生率低于先前发表的数据。疲劳分数与身体幸福感子量表分数之间存在关联。放疗结束时派珀疲劳量表得分较高,以及抑郁和嗜睡量表无变化,表明疲劳可能不是抑郁或睡眠障碍的结果。基于我们之前的研究工作,我们提出疲劳的身体表现可能继发于神经肌肉效率下降和肌肉疲劳增强。