• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸痛门诊对急性心肌梗死被排除后早期出院患者症状复发及再入院情况的影响。

Impact of a chest pain clinic on recurrency of symptoms and readmissions among patients early discharged from hospital after acute myocardial infarction was ruled out.

作者信息

Karlson B W, Währborg P, Sjöland H, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;5(1):29-35.

PMID:10406416
Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of an early revisit including symptom evaluation and an exercise electrocardiogram on recurrency of symptoms and readmissions during 1 year of follow-up among patients coming to hospital with chest pain or an initial suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but in whom the suspicion was quickly ruled out. Patients below the age of 65 admitted to the emergency department (ED) at Sahlgrenska Hospital due to chest pain or other symptoms raising a suspicion of AMI who were either directly discharged from the ED or discharged within 1 day after having AMI ruled out. Patients were allocated to two groups: (1) patients being re-evaluated in a chest pain clinic less than a week after discharge from hospital (intervention group) and (2) patients handled routinely with no formalized follow-up (control group). The intervention group (n=484) and the control group (n=374) were comparable at baseline. During 1 year of follow-up, patients in the intervention group had a lower rate of readmissions to the ED than patients in the control group (17.4% versus 24.9%, p < 0.05) and a lower rate of rehospitalizations (15.9% versus 23.3%, p < 0.05). The proportion of patients being on sick leave at any time during the follow-up did not differ and neither did the recurrency of symptoms. The introduction of a chest pain clinic for patients early discharged from hospital after having AMI ruled out indicated beneficiency in terms of a lower rate of readmissions to the ED and a lower requirement of rehospitalizations. However, a methodological weakness in the randomization procedure suggest carefulness in interpretation.

摘要

本文评估了早期复诊(包括症状评估和运动心电图)对因胸痛或最初怀疑急性心肌梗死(AMI)前来医院就诊但很快排除怀疑的患者在1年随访期间症状复发和再入院情况的影响。年龄在65岁以下、因胸痛或其他引发AMI怀疑的症状而入住萨尔格伦斯卡医院急诊科的患者,这些患者要么直接从急诊科出院,要么在排除AMI后的1天内出院。患者被分为两组:(1)出院后不到一周在胸痛门诊接受重新评估的患者(干预组)和(2)常规处理且无正式随访的患者(对照组)。干预组(n = 484)和对照组(n = 374)在基线时具有可比性。在1年的随访期间,干预组患者的急诊科再入院率低于对照组(17.4%对24.9%,p < 0.05),再住院率也较低(15.9%对23.3%,p < 0.05)。随访期间任何时候休病假的患者比例没有差异,症状复发情况也没有差异。为排除AMI后早期出院的患者设立胸痛门诊显示出在降低急诊科再入院率和再住院需求方面的益处。然而,随机化程序中的一个方法学弱点表明在解释时要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Impact of a chest pain clinic on recurrency of symptoms and readmissions among patients early discharged from hospital after acute myocardial infarction was ruled out.胸痛门诊对急性心肌梗死被排除后早期出院患者症状复发及再入院情况的影响。
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;5(1):29-35.
2
Important factors for the 10-year mortality rate in patients with acute chest pain or other symptoms consistent with acute myocardial infarction with particular emphasis on the influence of age.急性胸痛或其他与急性心肌梗死相符症状患者10年死亡率的重要因素,特别强调年龄的影响。
Am Heart J. 2001 Oct;142(4):624-32. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117965.
3
Impact of pre-hospital emergency in the management and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction.院前急救对急性心肌梗死治疗及预后的影响。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2005 Jun;24(6):863-72.
4
Usefulness of exercise test in selected patients coming to the emergency department for acute chest pain.运动试验在因急性胸痛前来急诊科的特定患者中的应用价值。
Ital Heart J. 2003 Feb;4(2):92-8.
5
The Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS): a multicenter registry of patients with suspicion of acute coronary syndromes reported using the standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department chest pain studies.急性冠状动脉综合征互联网追踪注册研究(i*trACS):一项使用急诊科胸痛研究标准化报告指南报告的疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的多中心注册研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;48(6):666-77, 677.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
6
Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain.因胸痛前往城市急诊科就诊患者中急性心肌梗死及其他严重疾病诊断的患病率。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):383-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.010.
7
Prognosis and gender differences in chest pain patients discharged from an ED.急诊科胸痛患者出院后的预后及性别差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;13(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90077-2.
8
Management of patients with low-risk chest pain at the time of admission: a prospective study on a non-selected population from the Emergency Department.入院时低风险胸痛患者的管理:一项针对急诊科非特定人群的前瞻性研究。
Ital Heart J. 2002 Jul;3(7):399-405.
9
Frequency of acute coronary syndrome in patients with normal electrocardiogram performed during presence or absence of chest pain.胸痛发作时或未发作时心电图正常的患者中急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):495-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00420.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
10
Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population.急诊科胸痛患者中心肌梗死溶栓风险评分的前瞻性验证
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.032. Epub 2006 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptom Trajectories After an Emergency Department Visit for Potential Acute Coronary Syndrome.因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征就诊于急诊科后的症状轨迹
Nurs Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;65(4):268-78. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000167.
2
An audit of activity and outcome from a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid assessment chest pain clinic.对每日和每周一次的“一站式”快速评估胸痛诊所的活动及结果进行的审计。
Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jan;78(915):43-6. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.915.43.