Karlson B W, Währborg P, Sjöland H, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J
Division of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;5(1):29-35.
This paper evaluates the impact of an early revisit including symptom evaluation and an exercise electrocardiogram on recurrency of symptoms and readmissions during 1 year of follow-up among patients coming to hospital with chest pain or an initial suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but in whom the suspicion was quickly ruled out. Patients below the age of 65 admitted to the emergency department (ED) at Sahlgrenska Hospital due to chest pain or other symptoms raising a suspicion of AMI who were either directly discharged from the ED or discharged within 1 day after having AMI ruled out. Patients were allocated to two groups: (1) patients being re-evaluated in a chest pain clinic less than a week after discharge from hospital (intervention group) and (2) patients handled routinely with no formalized follow-up (control group). The intervention group (n=484) and the control group (n=374) were comparable at baseline. During 1 year of follow-up, patients in the intervention group had a lower rate of readmissions to the ED than patients in the control group (17.4% versus 24.9%, p < 0.05) and a lower rate of rehospitalizations (15.9% versus 23.3%, p < 0.05). The proportion of patients being on sick leave at any time during the follow-up did not differ and neither did the recurrency of symptoms. The introduction of a chest pain clinic for patients early discharged from hospital after having AMI ruled out indicated beneficiency in terms of a lower rate of readmissions to the ED and a lower requirement of rehospitalizations. However, a methodological weakness in the randomization procedure suggest carefulness in interpretation.
本文评估了早期复诊(包括症状评估和运动心电图)对因胸痛或最初怀疑急性心肌梗死(AMI)前来医院就诊但很快排除怀疑的患者在1年随访期间症状复发和再入院情况的影响。年龄在65岁以下、因胸痛或其他引发AMI怀疑的症状而入住萨尔格伦斯卡医院急诊科的患者,这些患者要么直接从急诊科出院,要么在排除AMI后的1天内出院。患者被分为两组:(1)出院后不到一周在胸痛门诊接受重新评估的患者(干预组)和(2)常规处理且无正式随访的患者(对照组)。干预组(n = 484)和对照组(n = 374)在基线时具有可比性。在1年的随访期间,干预组患者的急诊科再入院率低于对照组(17.4%对24.9%,p < 0.05),再住院率也较低(15.9%对23.3%,p < 0.05)。随访期间任何时候休病假的患者比例没有差异,症状复发情况也没有差异。为排除AMI后早期出院的患者设立胸痛门诊显示出在降低急诊科再入院率和再住院需求方面的益处。然而,随机化程序中的一个方法学弱点表明在解释时要谨慎。