Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Am J Bot. 1999 Jul;86(7):1014-26.
Traditional sources of taxonomic characters in the large and taxonomically complex subfamily Apioideae (Apiaceae) have been confounding and no classification system of the subfamily has been widely accepted. A restriction site analysis of the chloroplast genome from 78 representatives of Apioideae and related groups provided a data matrix of 990 variable characters (750 of which were potentially parsimony-informative). A comparison of these data to that of three recent DNA sequencing studies of Apioideae (based on ITS, rpoCl intron, and matK sequences) shows that the restriction site analysis provides 2.6-3.6 times more variable characters for a comparable group of taxa. Moreover, levels of divergence appear to be well suited to studies at the subfamilial and tribal levels of Apiaceae. Cladistic and phenetic analyses of the restriction site data yielded trees that are visually congruent to those derived from the other recent molecular studies. On the basis of these comparisons, six lineages and one paraphyletic grade are provisionally recognized as informal groups. These groups can serve as the starting point for future, more intensive studies of the subfamily.
传统的分类学特征来源在大型且分类复杂的Apioideae 亚科(伞形科)中一直令人困惑,并且没有被广泛接受的亚科分类系统。对来自 78 个 Apioideae 代表和相关群的叶绿体基因组的限制位点分析提供了一个 990 个变量特征的数据矩阵(其中 750 个可能是简约信息丰富的)。将这些数据与 Apioideae 的三个最近 DNA 测序研究(基于 ITS、rpoCl 内含子和 matK 序列)的数据进行比较表明,对于可比的分类群,限制位点分析提供了 2.6-3.6 倍的更多可变性特征。此外,分化水平似乎非常适合伞形科亚科和部落水平的研究。限制位点数据的分支分析和表型分析产生的树与其他最近的分子研究得出的树在视觉上是一致的。基于这些比较,暂时承认六个谱系和一个并系等级作为非正式群体。这些群体可以作为未来更深入研究亚科的起点。