Schmidt R, Fazekas F, Kapeller P, Schmidt H, Hartung H P
Department of Neurology, Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria.
Neurology. 1999 Jul 13;53(1):132-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.1.132.
To determine the rate, clinical predictors, and cognitive consequences of MRI white matter hyperintensity evolution over 3 years.
In the setting of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study, 1.5-T MRI was performed at baseline and at a 3-year follow-up in 273 community-dwelling elderly (mean age, 60+/-6.1 years) without neuropsychiatric disease. At each visit individuals underwent a structured clinical interview and examination, EKG, echocardiography, extensive laboratory workup, and demanding neuropsychological testing. MR images were read by three independent raters, and the change of white matter hyperintensities from baseline was assessed by direct image comparison. The change was graded as absent, minor, or marked. Minor change was defined as a difference of no more than one to four punctate lesions between both scans. A change was considered to be marked if there was a difference of more than four abnormalities or a transition to early-confluent and confluent lesions.
Combined ratings indicated lesion progression in 49 individuals (17.9%). Lesion progression was minor in 27 participants (9.9%) and was marked in 22 (8.1%). Regression of white matter hyperintensities did not occur. Diastolic blood pressure (odds ratio, 1.07/mm Hg) and early-confluent or confluent white matter hyperintensities at baseline (odds ratio, 2.62) were the only significant predictors of white matter hyperintensity progression. Lesion progression had no influence on the course of neuropsychological test performance over the observational period.
White matter hyperintensities progress in elderly normal subjects. Our data may be used as a reference for future observational and interventional studies on white matter hyperintensity progression in various CNS diseases. The lack of an association between lesion progression and cognitive functioning needs to be explored further.
确定3年期间MRI白质高信号演变的发生率、临床预测因素及认知后果。
在奥地利卒中预防研究中,对273名无神经精神疾病的社区老年居民(平均年龄60±6.1岁)在基线时及3年随访时进行了1.5-T MRI检查。每次就诊时,个体均接受结构化临床访谈和检查、心电图、超声心动图、广泛的实验室检查以及严格的神经心理学测试。由三名独立评估者读取MR图像,并通过直接图像比较评估白质高信号相对于基线的变化。变化分为无、轻度或显著。轻度变化定义为两次扫描之间点状病变差异不超过1至4个。如果异常差异超过4个或转变为早期融合和融合病变,则认为变化显著。
综合评估表明49名个体(17.9%)出现病变进展。27名参与者(9.9%)病变进展为轻度,22名(8.1%)为显著。白质高信号未出现消退。舒张压(优势比,1.07/mmHg)和基线时早期融合或融合的白质高信号(优势比,2.62)是白质高信号进展的唯一显著预测因素。在观察期内,病变进展对神经心理学测试表现的过程没有影响。
老年正常受试者白质高信号会进展。我们的数据可为未来关于各种中枢神经系统疾病中白质高信号进展的观察性和干预性研究提供参考。病变进展与认知功能之间缺乏关联这一情况需要进一步探究。