Gow P, Berg S, Smith D, Ross D
Middlemore Hospital, South Auckland Health, Otahuhu, New Zealand.
J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Jun;19(2):107-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00312.x.
Inpatient discharge surveys at Middlemore hospital, a 600 bed hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand, consistently rate communication and co-ordination of care as parameters in need of improvement. A case management model of care was suggested as a means of achieving this. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of care co-ordination in an acute general medical setting in a pilot study over a 4 week period. A care co-ordinator identified 18 patients with complex problems among 48 patients admitted to a single medical ward under the care of a single multidisciplinary team, with their care being co-ordinated over the entire episode of illness. A control group of 59 similarly complex patients admitted to other wards and teams without care co-ordination over the same period was also studied and the outcomes compared. Communication and co-ordination, discharge information, involvement in discharge planning and information on post-discharge services were rated by the study patients as good or very good by 77, 85, 69 and 77%, respectively, compared with 62, 30, 41 and 45% in the control group. The same parameters were rated as poor or very poor by 13, 30, 36 and 15% of the control patients, compared with 0% in all these measures in the study group. Twenty-one clinical staff involved in the study agreed that there was an improvement in care co-ordination with respect to efficiency, reduction of workload and better communication, with approval ratings being 71, 76 and 76%, respectively. There was no difference in Average Length of Stay between the control and study groups, but three of the patients in the control group may have had their preventable readmissions within 10 days avoided if their care had been co-ordinated during their initial admission.
位于新西兰南奥克兰的米德尔莫尔医院是一家拥有600张床位的医院,其住院患者出院调查一直将沟通和护理协调列为需要改进的指标。有人建议采用病例管理护理模式来实现这一目标。本研究的目的是在一项为期4周的试点研究中,确定急性普通内科环境中护理协调的有效性。一名护理协调员在由一个多学科团队护理的单个内科病房收治的48名患者中,识别出18名有复杂问题的患者,并在整个病程中对他们的护理进行协调。还对同期收治到其他病房且未进行护理协调的59名同样复杂的患者组成的对照组进行了研究,并比较了结果。研究患者对沟通与协调、出院信息、参与出院计划以及出院后服务信息的评价为良好或非常好的比例分别为77%、85%、69%和77%,而对照组的这一比例分别为62%、30%、41%和45%。对照组患者中分别有13%、30%、36%和15%对相同指标的评价为差或非常差,而研究组在所有这些指标上的评价为差或非常差的比例均为0%。参与研究的21名临床工作人员一致认为,护理协调在效率、工作量减少和沟通改善方面有提升,认可率分别为71%、76%和76%。对照组和研究组的平均住院时间没有差异,但如果对照组的3名患者在首次住院期间得到护理协调,他们可能避免了10天内的可预防再入院情况。