Coleman Eric A, Eilertsen Theresa B, Magid David J, Conner Douglas A, Beck Arne, Kramer Andrew M
Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80206, USA.
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e03. doi: 10.5334/ijic.69. Epub 2002 Oct 24.
To investigate the association between care co-ordination and use of the Emergency Department (ED) in older managed care enrollees.
Nested case-control with 103 cases (used the ED) and 194 controls (did not use the ED).
Older patients with multiple chronic illnesses enrolled in a care management programme of a large group-model health maintenance organisation with more than 50,000 members over the age of 64. Better care co-ordination was defined as timely follow-up after a change in treatment; fewer decision-makers involved with the care plan; and a higher patient-perceived rating of overall care co-ordination. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ED use (the outcome variable) and measures of care co-ordination (the predictor variables).
Self-reported care co-ordination was not significantly different between cases and controls for any of the four classifications of inappropriate ED use. Similarly, no differences were found in the number of different physicians or medication prescribers involved in the patients' care. Four-week follow-up after potentially high-risk events for subsequent ED use, including changes in chronic disease medications, missed encounters, and same day encounters, did not differ between subjects with inappropriate ED use and controls.
Existing measures of care co-ordination were not associated with inappropriate ED use in this study of older adults with complex care needs. The absence of an association may, in part, be attributable to the paucity of validated measures to assess care co-ordination, as well as the methodological complexity inherent in studying this topic. Future research should focus on the development of new measures and on approaches that better isolate the role of care co-ordination from other potential variables that influence utilisation.
探讨老年管理式医疗参保者中护理协调与急诊科(ED)使用之间的关联。
嵌套病例对照研究,103例病例(使用了急诊科)和194例对照(未使用急诊科)。
患有多种慢性病的老年患者参加了一个大型团体模式健康维护组织的护理管理项目,该组织有超过50,000名64岁以上的成员。更好的护理协调被定义为治疗改变后的及时随访;参与护理计划的决策者较少;以及患者对整体护理协调的评分较高。采用逻辑回归分析来评估急诊科使用(结果变量)与护理协调措施(预测变量)之间的关系。
在四种不适当急诊科使用分类中的任何一种情况下,病例组和对照组在自我报告的护理协调方面均无显著差异。同样,在参与患者护理的不同医生或药物开处方者的数量上也没有发现差异。对于后续急诊科使用的潜在高风险事件(包括慢性病药物的变化、错过的会诊和同日会诊)进行四周随访时,不适当急诊科使用的受试者与对照组之间没有差异。
在这项针对有复杂护理需求的老年人的研究中,现有的护理协调措施与不适当的急诊科使用无关。这种关联的缺失可能部分归因于评估护理协调的有效措施的匮乏,以及研究该主题所固有的方法复杂性。未来的研究应侧重于开发新的措施以及更好地将护理协调的作用与其他影响利用率的潜在变量区分开来的方法。