Matsumoto T, Ebata J, Tachibana H, Goto M, Kajiya F
Department of Medical Engineering and Systems Cardiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama 701-0192, Japan.
Am J Physiol. 1999 Jul;277(1):H183-91. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.1.H183.
Within-layer regional myocardial flows in the left and right ventricles (LV, RV) and in LV with increased myocardial workload (beta(1)-adrenoceptor stimulation) were studied transmurally in anesthetized rabbits. Myocardial flow distribution was visualized with resolutions between 0.1 x 0.1- and 1 x 1-mm(2) pixels, using digital radiography combined with the (3)H-labeled desmethylimipramine deposition technique. The spatial pattern of flow distribution was quantitated by the coefficient of variation of regional flows (CV, related to global flow heterogeneity) and the correlation between adjacent regional flows (CA, inversely related to local flow randomness). CV was lower in LV than in RV [P < 0.05, nonparametric 2-way analysis of variance (NANOVA)]. When resolution was lowered from 0.1 x 0.1- to 1 x 1-mm(2) pixels, CV decreased by 70% in both LV and RV. CA was higher in LV than in RV (P < 0.05, NANOVA); the interventricular difference in CA was large over the resolutions between 0.4 x 0.4- and 1 x 1-mm(2) pixels. In LV, both CV and CA increased with depth of myocardium (P < 0.05, NANOVA); in subendocardium CV was high comparable with CV in RV (P = 0.47, NANOVA). The enhancement of myocardial workload decreased CV and tended to decrease CA in LV subendocardium (P < 0.05, P = 0.06, respectively; NANOVA). We conclude that 1) microregional flow distribution is less heterogeneous and less random in LV than in RV; 2) transmurally, in LV subendocardium global flow heterogeneity was the highest whereas local flow randomness was the lowest, so that clusters of low- or high-flow regions exist in this LV layer; and 3) global flow heterogeneity decreased and local flow randomness tended to increase (flow homogenizing occurred) in LV subendocardium with increasing myocardial workload. Thus the distributed pattern of myocardial microregional flows may be adaptable to local myocardial metabolic change.
在麻醉兔身上,经壁研究了左心室(LV)、右心室(RV)以及心肌工作负荷增加(β1 - 肾上腺素能受体刺激)时左心室的层内区域心肌血流。采用数字射线照相结合3H标记的去甲丙咪嗪沉积技术,以0.1×0.1 - 至1×1 - mm2像素的分辨率观察心肌血流分布情况。通过区域血流变异系数(CV,与整体血流异质性相关)和相邻区域血流之间的相关性(CA,与局部血流随机性呈负相关)对血流分布的空间模式进行定量分析。左心室的CV低于右心室[P < 0.05,非参数双向方差分析(NANOVA)]。当分辨率从0.1×0.1 - mm2像素降低至1×1 - mm2像素时,左心室和右心室的CV均下降了70%。左心室的CA高于右心室(P < 0.05,NANOVA);在0.4×0.4 - 至1×1 - mm2像素的分辨率范围内,两心室之间CA的差异较大。在左心室,CV和CA均随心肌深度增加而升高(P < 0.05,NANOVA);心内膜下层的CV与右心室相当(P = 0.47,NANOVA)。心肌工作负荷的增加使左心室心内膜下层的CV降低,且CA有降低趋势(分别为P < 0.05和P = 0.06;NANOVA)。我们得出以下结论:1)左心室的微区域血流分布比右心室的异质性更低且随机性更小;2)经壁观察,左心室心内膜下层的整体血流异质性最高,而局部血流随机性最低,因此该左心室层存在低血流或高血流区域簇;3)随着心肌工作负荷增加,左心室心内膜下层的整体血流异质性降低,局部血流随机性有增加趋势(血流趋于均匀)。因此,心肌微区域血流的分布模式可能适应局部心肌代谢变化。