Castiglioni P, Parati G, Omboni S, Mancia G, Imholz B P, Wesseling K H, Di Rienzo M
LaRC, Centro di Bioingegneria, Fondazione Don C. Gnocchi and Politecnico di Milano, via Gozzadini 7, I-20148 Milan, Italy.
Clin Sci (Lond). 1999 Aug;97(2):129-39.
The present study compares the spectral characteristics of 24-h blood pressure variability estimated invasively at the brachial artery level with those estimated by measurement of blood pressure at the finger artery using the non-invasive Portapres device. Broad-band spectra (from 3x10(-5) to 0.5 Hz) were derived from both finger and intra-brachial pressures recorded simultaneously for 24 h in eight normotensive and twelve hypertensive ambulant subjects. At frequencies lower than 0.07 Hz, higher spectral estimates were obtained by Portapres than by intra-brachial measurements. The maximum overestimation occurred in systolic pressure at around 10(-2) Hz, where the amplitude of the oscillations was two times greater when measured by Portapres. A less pronounced overestimation was found for diastolic pressures. The maximum overestimation was greater during daytime than during night-time. At around 0.1 Hz, invasive and non-invasive spectra were similar. At the respiratory frequencies (0.15-0.50 Hz), the power spectra were overestimated by Portapres during daytime, and underestimated at night. These results provide reference information for the correct interpretation of Portapres data in the estimation of 24-h blood pressure spectral power.
本研究比较了通过肱动脉水平有创估计的24小时血压变异性的频谱特征与使用无创Portapres装置通过测量手指动脉血压估计的频谱特征。在8名血压正常和12名高血压门诊患者中,同时记录24小时的手指和肱动脉内压力,得出宽带频谱(从3×10⁻⁵到0.5赫兹)。在低于0.07赫兹的频率下,Portapres获得的频谱估计值高于肱动脉内测量值。最大高估出现在收缩压约10⁻²赫兹处,此时用Portapres测量时振荡幅度大两倍。舒张压的高估不太明显。白天的最大高估比夜间更大。在约0.1赫兹处,有创和无创频谱相似。在呼吸频率(0.15 - 0.50赫兹)下,Portapres在白天高估了功率谱,而在夜间低估了功率谱。这些结果为在估计24小时血压频谱功率时正确解释Portapres数据提供了参考信息。