Suppr超能文献

通过动脉内和指尖脉搏压力曲线采用模型流量法测量心输出量。

Cardiac output by Modelflow method from intra-arterial and fingertip pulse pressure profiles.

作者信息

Azabji Kenfack Marcel, Lador Federic, Licker Marc, Moia Christian, Tam Enrico, Capelli Carlo, Morel Denis, Ferretti Guido

机构信息

Département de Physiologie, Centre Médical Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 2004 Apr;106(4):365-9. doi: 10.1042/CS20030303.

Abstract

Modelflow, when applied to non-invasive fingertip pulse pressure recordings, is a poor predictor of cardiac output (Q, litre x min(-1)). The use of constants established from the aortic elastic characteristics, which differ from those of finger arteries, may introduce signal distortions, leading to errors in computing Q. We therefore hypothesized that peripheral recording of pulse pressure profiles undermines the measurement of Q with Modelflow, so we compared Modelflow beat-by-beat Q values obtained simultaneously non-invasively from the finger and invasively from the radial artery at rest and during exercise. Seven subjects (age, 24.0 +/- 2.9 years; weight, 81.2 +/- 12.6 kg) rested, then exercised at 50 and 100 W, carrying a catheter with a pressure head in the left radial artery and the photoplethysmographic cuff of a finger pressure device on the third and fourth fingers of the contralateral hand. Pulse pressure from both devices was recorded simultaneously and stored on a PC for subsequent Q computation. The mean values of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure at rest and exercise steady state were significantly ( P < 0.05) lower from the finger than the intra-arterial catheter. The corresponding mean steady-state Q obtained from the finger (Qporta) was significantly ( P < 0.05) higher than that computed from the intra-arterial recordings (Qpia). The line relating beat-by-beat Qporta and Qpia was y =1.55 x -3.02 ( r2 = 0.640). The bias was 1.44 litre x min(-1) and the precision was 2.84 litre x min(-1). The slope of this line was significantly higher than 1, implying a systematic overestimate of Q by Qporta with respect to Qpia. Consistent with the tested hypothesis, these results demonstrate that pulse pressure profiles from the finger provide inaccurate absolute Q values with respect to the radial artery, and therefore cannot be used without correction with a calibration factor calculated previously by measuring Q with an independent method.

摘要

当将模型流应用于无创指尖脉搏压力记录时,它对心输出量(Q,升×分钟⁻¹)的预测能力较差。使用根据主动脉弹性特征确定的常数(这些常数与手指动脉的不同)可能会引入信号失真,从而导致计算Q时出现误差。因此,我们假设外周脉搏压力曲线记录会破坏模型流对Q的测量,所以我们比较了在静息和运动期间同时从手指无创获得以及从桡动脉有创获得的模型流逐搏Q值。7名受试者(年龄,24.0±2.9岁;体重,81.2±12.6千克)先静息,然后以50瓦和100瓦功率进行运动,在左桡动脉中置入带有压力传感器的导管,并在对侧手的第三和第四指上佩戴手指压力装置的光电容积脉搏波描记袖带。同时记录两个装置的脉搏压力并存储在个人电脑上,以便后续计算Q。静息和运动稳态时手指测量的收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压的平均值显著(P<0.05)低于动脉内导管测量的值。从手指获得的相应平均稳态Q(Qporta)显著(P<0.05)高于从动脉内记录计算得到的Q(Qpia)。逐搏Qporta与Qpia的关系线为y = 1.55x - 3.02(r² = 0.640)。偏差为1.44升×分钟⁻¹,精密度为2.84升×分钟⁻¹。这条线的斜率显著高于1,这意味着相对于Qpia,Qporta系统地高估了Q。与所检验的假设一致,这些结果表明,相对于桡动脉,手指的脉搏压力曲线提供的绝对Q值不准确,因此在没有用先前通过独立方法测量Q计算出的校准因子进行校正的情况下不能使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验