Suppr超能文献

善良的挑战II:1991年至1995年在克罗地亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那开发,并于1999年在科索沃应用和评估的新型人道主义技术。

Challenge of Goodness II: new humanitarian technology, developed in croatia and bosnia and Herzegovina in 1991-1995, and applied and evaluated in Kosovo 1999.

作者信息

Lang S

机构信息

Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Rockefellerova 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 1999 Sep;40(3):438-45.

Abstract

This paper presents improvements of the humanitarian proposals of the Challenge of Goodness project published earlier (1). In 1999 Kosovo crisis, these proposals were checked in practice. The priority was again on the practical intervention - helping people directly - to prevent, stop, and ease suffering. Kosovo experience also prompted us to modify the concept of the Challenge of Goodness. It should include research and education (1. redefinition of health, 2. confronting genocide, 3. university studies and education, and 4. collecting experience); evaluation (1. Red Cross forum, 2. organization and technology assessment, 3. Open Hand - Experience of Good People); activities in different stages of war or conflict in: 1. prevention (right to a home, Hate Watch, early warning), 2. duration (refugee camps, prisoners-of-war camps, global hospital, minorities), 3. end of conflict (planned, organized, and evaluated protection), 4. post conflict (remaini ng and abandoned populations, prisoners of war and missing persons, civilian participation, return, and renewal). Effectiveness of humanitarian intervention may be performed by politicians, soldiers, humanitarian workers, and volunteers, but the responsibility lies on science. Science must objectively collect data, develop hypotheses, check them in practice, allow education, and be the force of good, upon which everybody can rely. Never since the World War II has anybody in Europe suffered in war and conflict so much as peoples in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo. We should search for the meaning of their suffering, and develop new knowledge and technology of peace.

摘要

本文介绍了之前发表的“善的挑战”项目人道主义提案的改进内容(1)。在1999年科索沃危机中,这些提案得到了实践检验。重点再次放在实际干预上——直接帮助人们——以预防、制止和减轻痛苦。科索沃的经历也促使我们修改“善的挑战”的概念。它应包括研究与教育(1. 健康的重新定义,2. 直面种族灭绝,3. 大学研究与教育,4. 经验收集);评估(1. 红十字论坛,2. 组织与技术评估,3. 善人的开放之手——经验);在战争或冲突不同阶段的活动:1. 预防(住房权、仇恨观察、早期预警),2. 持续期间(难民营、战俘营、全球医院、少数群体),3. 冲突结束时(有计划、有组织且经过评估的保护),4. 冲突后(留存和被遗弃人口、战俘和失踪人员、平民参与、回归与重建)。人道主义干预的有效性可由政治家、士兵、人道主义工作者和志愿者来实现,但责任在于科学。科学必须客观地收集数据、提出假设、在实践中检验假设、促进教育,并成为人人都能依靠的善的力量。自第二次世界大战以来,欧洲从未有任何人像克罗地亚、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那以及科索沃的人民那样在战争和冲突中遭受如此多的苦难。我们应该探寻他们苦难的意义,并开发和平的新知识和新技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验