• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动牙刷:临床试验综述

Powered toothbrushes: a review of clinical trials.

作者信息

Heasman P A, McCracken G I

机构信息

Restorative Dentistry, The Dental School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):407-20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260701.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260701.x
PMID:10412844
Abstract

There is now a vast range of powered toothbrushes (PTBs) available on the market and the efficacy of each product is usually determined in one, or a series of controlled clinical trials. This article reviews briefly the design of PTBs, some of the proposed indications for their use, and the principal observations from published studies of these products. The important issues regarding the regulation and design of trials involving PTBs are discussed and some recommendations are proposed with a view to developing a more structured approach to testing these products.

摘要

目前市场上有各种各样的电动牙刷,每种产品的功效通常是在一项或一系列对照临床试验中确定的。本文简要回顾了电动牙刷的设计、一些建议的使用指征以及这些产品已发表研究的主要观察结果。讨论了涉及电动牙刷试验的监管和设计的重要问题,并提出了一些建议,以期形成一种更具结构性的方法来测试这些产品。

相似文献

1
Powered toothbrushes: a review of clinical trials.电动牙刷:临床试验综述
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):407-20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260701.x.
2
Clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of powered toothbrushes.
Adv Dent Res. 2002 May;16(1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/154407370201600104.
3
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
4
[Evaluation of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in preventing oral diseases (Systematic review with meta-analysis)].电动牙刷与手动牙刷预防口腔疾病效果的评估(系统评价与Meta分析)
Fogorv Sz. 2016 Mar;109(1):3-22.
5
Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children.4至5岁儿童使用电动牙刷和手动牙刷去除牙菌斑的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):225-30.
6
Dental plaque removal effectiveness of two powered toothbrushes.两款电动牙刷清除牙菌斑的效果
Am J Dent. 2004 Jan;17 Spec No:8A-12A.
7
Quality of trials in a systematic review of powered toothbrushes: suggestions for future clinical trials.电动牙刷系统评价中的试验质量:对未来临床试验的建议。
J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):1944-53. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050349.
8
Manual versus powered toothbrushes: the Cochrane review.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Sep;134(9):1240-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0359.
9
The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for dental health: a systematic review.手动牙刷与电动牙刷对口腔健康的有效性:一项系统评价。
J Dent. 2004 Mar;32(3):197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.11.006.
10
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison Between Powered and Manual Toothbrushes Effectiveness for Maintaining an Optimal Oral Health Status.电动牙刷与手动牙刷在维持最佳口腔健康状况方面的效果比较。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2024 Oct 2;16:381-396. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S490156. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of interactive power toothbrush with or without application assistance on the plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion among dental students: a randomized controlled clinical trial.互动电动牙刷联合或不联合应用辅助对医学生菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈磨损的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5931-5941. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04553-3. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Ionic vs Manual Toothbrushes: Effect on Plaque and Oral Hygiene Status in Children.
电动牙刷与手动牙刷:对儿童牙菌斑和口腔卫生状况的影响。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):375-378. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1675.
4
How effective is a powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush? A systematic review and meta-analysis of single brushing exercises.电动牙刷相对于手动牙刷的效果如何?单次刷牙的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2020 Feb;18(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/idh.12401. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Comparison of Efficacy of Manual and Powered Toothbrushes in Plaque Control and Gingival Inflammation: A Clinical Study among the Population of East Indian Region.手动牙刷与电动牙刷在菌斑控制和牙龈炎症方面的疗效比较:东印度地区人群的一项临床研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;7(4):168-174. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_133_17. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
6
Comparison of sonic and ionic toothbrush in reduction in plaque and gingivitis.声波牙刷与离子牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Jul;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.85662.
7
Extent and quality of systematic review evidence related to minimum intervention in dentistry: essential oils, powered toothbrushes, triclosan, xylitol.有关牙科最小干预的系统评价证据的范围和质量:精油、电动牙刷、三氯生、木糖醇。
Int Dent J. 2011 Aug;61(4):179-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00055.x.