• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动牙刷与手动牙刷:对儿童牙菌斑和口腔卫生状况的影响。

Ionic vs Manual Toothbrushes: Effect on Plaque and Oral Hygiene Status in Children.

作者信息

Chandra Shivangi, Jain Nalini, Garg Rishabh, Dhawan Preeti, Tuli Avantika, Kumar Gyanendra

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Department of Periodontics, Kalka Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):375-378. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1675.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1675
PMID:32440040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229365/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The foundation for healthy permanent teeth in children and teenagers is laid during the first few years of life. Toothbrushing should be presented as a habit. A wide array of toothbrushes is available in the market, which differ in size, design, length, hardness, arrangement of bristles. This present clinical study is undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of ionic toothbrush on oral hygiene status and plaque removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 children aged 6 years to 12 years were selected in this study. The children were divided into two groups, 15 children were given HyG ionic toothbrush, were instructed how to use product according to manufacturer's instructions, 15 children were assigned to use manual toothbrush, instructed to brush their teeth in usual manner. All subjects used the same commercially available dentifrice throughout the study.

RESULTS

The results were evaluated at each visit day 0, day 15 and day 30 following 12-18 hours of no oral hygiene. The subjects brushed their teeth twice daily for 1 minute under supervision. The result showed that there was significant difference in all the mean values in all the parameters. It may be concluded from the present study that though the ionic toothbrush was insignificantly superior to the manual toothbrush, both the toothbrushes are clinically effective in removing plaque and improving the gingival conditions.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Chandra S, Jain N, Garg R, Ionic vs Manual Toothbrushes: Effect on Plaque and Oral Hygiene Status in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(5):375-378.

摘要

引言

儿童和青少年健康恒牙的基础在生命的最初几年奠定。应将刷牙作为一种习惯来培养。市场上有各种各样的牙刷,它们在尺寸、设计、长度、硬度、刷毛排列等方面存在差异。本临床研究旨在评估离子牙刷对口腔卫生状况和牙菌斑清除的有效性。

材料与方法

本研究共选取30名6至12岁的儿童。将这些儿童分为两组,15名儿童使用HyG离子牙刷,并按照制造商的说明指导如何使用该产品;15名儿童被分配使用手动牙刷,并按常规方式刷牙。在整个研究过程中,所有受试者使用相同的市售牙膏。

结果

在0天、15天和30天每次就诊时,在12 - 18小时未进行口腔卫生护理后对结果进行评估。受试者在监督下每天刷牙两次,每次1分钟。结果表明,所有参数的所有平均值均存在显著差异。从本研究可以得出结论,尽管离子牙刷比手动牙刷略优,但两种牙刷在临床上都能有效清除牙菌斑并改善牙龈状况。

如何引用本文

Chandra S, Jain N, Garg R, 离子牙刷与手动牙刷:对儿童牙菌斑和口腔卫生状况的影响。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2019年;12(5):375 - 378。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e9f3b4665859/ijcpd-12-375-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/6892a767e166/ijcpd-12-375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e92ccd92ec0a/ijcpd-12-375-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e40605f5dbe5/ijcpd-12-375-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e9f3b4665859/ijcpd-12-375-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/6892a767e166/ijcpd-12-375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e92ccd92ec0a/ijcpd-12-375-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e40605f5dbe5/ijcpd-12-375-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b6/7229365/e9f3b4665859/ijcpd-12-375-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Ionic vs Manual Toothbrushes: Effect on Plaque and Oral Hygiene Status in Children.电动牙刷与手动牙刷:对儿童牙菌斑和口腔卫生状况的影响。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):375-378. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1675.
2
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
3
A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush.一项临床研究,比较一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与市售手动平切牙刷在龈上菌斑和牙龈炎治疗效果方面的差异。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A11-6.
4
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
5
Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles and an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Established Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque over a 12-Week Period.软质锥形刷毛牙刷与美国牙医学会参考牙刷对已患牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的12周疗效比较
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):39-47.
6
Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Three Manual Toothbrushes.三种手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果比较
J Clin Dent. 2016 Sep;27(3):71-75.
7
Effectiveness of three different types of electric toothbrushes compared with a manual technique in orthodontic patients.三种不同类型电动牙刷与手动刷牙技术在正畸患者中的效果比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Dec;110(6):630-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)80040-0.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Plaque Removal Using Manual and Powered Toothbrush in Cerebral Palsy Children by Parents/Caregivers: A Randomized Control Crossover Trial.家长/照料者使用手动牙刷和电动牙刷为脑瘫儿童清除牙菌斑的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照交叉试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):344-349. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2533.
9
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.
10
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a new manual toothbrush on gingivitis reduction and plaque removal.一种新型手动牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和清除牙菌斑方面的临床疗效比较。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004 Oct;25(10 Suppl 2):28-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis of the Relative Effect on Plaque Index among Pediatric Patients Using Powered (Electric) versus Manual Toothbrushes.使用电动牙刷与手动牙刷对儿科患者牙菌斑指数相对影响的系统评价和荟萃分析
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(2):46. doi: 10.3390/dj11020046.

本文引用的文献

1
Dietary habits and oral health related behaviors in relation to DMFT indexes of a group of young adult patients attending a dental school.一组就读于牙科学院的年轻成年患者的饮食习惯及与口腔健康相关行为与龋失补指数的关系
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Dec 1;13(12):E800-7.
2
Status of oral health awareness in Indian children as compared to Western children: a thought provoking situation (a pilot study).与西方儿童相比,印度儿童口腔健康意识状况:一个发人深省的情况(一项试点研究)。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Mar;25(1):15-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.31983.
3
Toothbrush selection: a dilemma?
牙刷的选择:一个两难的问题?
Indian J Dent Res. 2006 Oct-Dec;17(4):167-70. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.29869.
4
Powered toothbrushes: a review of clinical trials.电动牙刷:临床试验综述
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):407-20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260701.x.
5
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of an electric and a manual children's toothbrush.电动与手动儿童牙刷的功效及安全性比较
J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Apr;128(4):469-74. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0232.
6
Clinical evaluation of an ionic toothbrush in the removal of established plaque and reduction of gingivitis.
Quintessence Int. 1996 Jun;27(6):389-94.
7
Improved maintenance of plaque control by electrical toothbrushing in periodontitis patients with low compliance.对于依从性低的牙周炎患者,电动牙刷可改善菌斑控制的维持情况。
J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Apr;20(4):235-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00350.x.
8
Clinical and computer-assisted evaluations of the stain removal ability of the Sonicare electronic toothbrush.对飞利浦声波震动牙刷污渍清除能力的临床及计算机辅助评估。
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):13-8.
9
Adolescents brush better with an electric toothbrush.青少年使用电动牙刷刷牙效果更好。
J Dent Child. 1967 Sep;34(5):354-8.
10
A survey of toothbrushing behaviour in children and young adults.一项关于儿童和年轻人刷牙行为的调查。
J Periodontal Res. 1978 Jul;13(4):382-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1978.tb00193.x.